Difference between revisions of "201805 Clinical Research Track"
Wayne Kubick (talk | contribs) |
Wayne Kubick (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<!-- What will be the actions performed by participants? --> | <!-- What will be the actions performed by participants? --> | ||
| − | ===Scenario | + | ===Scenario 1: Create Research Study and Research Subject Resources === |
| + | :Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> | ||
| + | :Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> | ||
| + | :Success Criteria: <!-- How will the participants know if the test was successful? --> | ||
| + | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- Provide a description of each task --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Scenario 2: Prepopulate eCRF from EHR with New or Updated Clinical Data === | ||
| + | :Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> | ||
| + | :Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> | ||
| + | :Success Criteria: <!-- How will the participants know if the test was successful? --> | ||
| + | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- Provide a description of each task --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Scenario 3: Submit Updated Clinical Data from Research Database to EHR === | ||
:Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> | :Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> | ||
:Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> | :Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 28 March 2018
Track Name
Clinical Research
Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group
Biopharma FHIR Project Group
Justification
This track will continue to evaluate use of FHIR for clinical research of new biopharmaceutical experimental treatments, seeking to advance the use of FHIR resources as eSource data used to pre-populate clinical research case report forms for both regulated and non-regulated clinical research. Plans for this connection include participation from at least 3 clinical data system implementers and pharmaceutical companies. 3 detailed use case scenarios will be proposed, 2 of which build on prior work at previous connectathons, and one exploring a new area for writing back with updates to clinical data from a clinical system. This work will inform development of profiles and IGs to support clinical research using FHIR, which will likely inform projects of the BR&R workgroup.
Clinical Research studies currently require the redundant entry of clinical data that already typically reside in Meaningful Use conformant EHR systems. EHR data represents original records in electronic format that can be used as eSource and directly imported into clinical research EDC databases so as to improve the quality and consistency of data between EHR and EDC systems and eliminate the need for redundant data entry. Establishing interoperability between EHR and EDC systems to streamline and modernize clinical investigations should improve data accuracy, patient safety, and clinical research efficiency. Given the extreme cost and extended time required for randomized clinical trials, it would be substantially better to utilize EHR source data to directly populate clinical trial databases wherever feasible. As stated in its May 2016 FDA draft guidance titled “Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations” FDA “encourages sponsors and clinical investigators to work with the entities that control the EHRs, such as health care organizations, to use EHRs and EDC systems that are interoperable. . . Establishing interoperability between EHR and EDC systems to streamline and modernize clinical investigations should improve data accuracy, patient safety, and clinical research efficiency.”
Proposed Track Lead
Geoff Low, Medidata
See Connectathon_Track_Lead_Responsibilities
Expected participants
Medidata, UCB, Parexel
Roles
Please include information here regarding how much advance preparation will be required if creating a client and/or server.
Role 1 Name
Scenarios
Scenario 1: Create Research Study and Research Subject Resources
- Action:
- Precondition:
- Success Criteria:
- Bonus point:
Scenario 2: Prepopulate eCRF from EHR with New or Updated Clinical Data
- Action:
- Precondition:
- Success Criteria:
- Bonus point:
Scenario 3: Submit Updated Clinical Data from Research Database to EHR
- Action:
- Precondition:
- Success Criteria:
- Bonus point:
