This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 1 November 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
| − | # | + | # attendee agenda items |
# confirm problem statement | # confirm problem statement | ||
## transforms across: is this any different from any other transform | ## transforms across: is this any different from any other transform | ||
## transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy? | ## transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy? | ||
## DL: partition | ## DL: partition | ||
| − | # | + | # What should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns? |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:55, 1 November 2017
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2017-11-01 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
| y | Emma Jones | ||
| y | Rob Hausam | ||
| y | Angela Crovetti | ||
| y | George Dixon | ||
| Richard Esmond | |||
| Andrew Haslam | |||
| Floyd Eisenberg | |||
| Susan Barber | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- attendee agenda items
- confirm problem statement
- transforms across: is this any different from any other transform
- transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy?
- DL: partition
- What should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns?
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Most attendees for orientation, no agenda items
- confirm problem statement
- transforms across: is this any different from any other transform
- transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy?
- DL: partition
- examples
- George: MU requirement patient has no problems. Implementers may use 'problem' and negation, but text is 'problem' -- a structure vs text issue
- Emma: STU comment - easy to represent pregnancy, but unclear how to represent 'not pregnant'
- pregnant code with negation
- not pregnant code
- pregnancy question with 'no'
- Should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns?
- Answer unclear. Produce a, maybe b, see how far we can get.
- Need more 'consumption' cases to cross-reference 'capture' cases
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.