This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 1 November 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | # no | + | # Most attendees for orientation, no agenda items |
| + | # confirm problem statement | ||
| + | ## transforms across: is this any different from any other transform | ||
| + | ## transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy? | ||
| + | ## DL: partition | ||
| + | # examples | ||
| + | ## George: MU requirement patient has no problems. Implementers may use 'problem' and negation, but text is 'problem' -- a structure vs text issue | ||
| + | ## Emma: STU comment - easy to represent pregnancy, but unclear how to represent 'not pregnant' | ||
| + | ### pregnant code with negation | ||
| + | ### not pregnant code | ||
| + | ### pregnancy question with 'no' | ||
| + | # Should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns? | ||
| + | ## Answer unclear. Produce a, maybe b, see how far we can get. | ||
| + | # Need more 'consumption' cases to cross-reference 'capture' cases | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 1 November 2017
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2017-11-01 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
| y | Emma Jones | ||
| y | Rob Hausam | ||
| y | Angela Crovetti | ||
| y | George Dixon | ||
| Richard Esmond | |||
| Andrew Haslam | |||
| Floyd Eisenberg | |||
| Susan Barber | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Most attendees for orientation, no agenda items
- confirm problem statement
- transforms across: is this any different from any other transform
- transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy?
- DL: partition
- examples
- George: MU requirement patient has no problems. Implementers may use 'problem' and negation, but text is 'problem' -- a structure vs text issue
- Emma: STU comment - easy to represent pregnancy, but unclear how to represent 'not pregnant'
- pregnant code with negation
- not pregnant code
- pregnancy question with 'no'
- Should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns?
- Answer unclear. Produce a, maybe b, see how far we can get.
- Need more 'consumption' cases to cross-reference 'capture' cases
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Most attendees for orientation, no agenda items
- confirm problem statement
- transforms across: is this any different from any other transform
- transforms within: this is really a condition/observation argument. others? allergy?
- DL: partition
- examples
- George: MU requirement patient has no problems. Implementers may use 'problem' and negation, but text is 'problem' -- a structure vs text issue
- Emma: STU comment - easy to represent pregnancy, but unclear how to represent 'not pregnant'
- pregnant code with negation
- not pregnant code
- pregnancy question with 'no'
- Should ballot deliver a) guidance & best practices, c) normative policy pronouncements, or something in between, like b) recommended patterns?
- Answer unclear. Produce a, maybe b, see how far we can get.
- Need more 'consumption' cases to cross-reference 'capture' cases
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
