This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20071005"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana) | *Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana) | ||
| + | **[http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/images/f/fe/PeerReviewForm_%282%29.doc Peer Review Form] | ||
| + | ** [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/images/4/43/RIM_Document_Assessment_08.doc RIM Assessment document ] | ||
The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials. | The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
# Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd | # Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd | ||
# Review the documents and provide the following: | # Review the documents and provide the following: | ||
| − | + | ** A copy of the original text with tracking turned on edits marked to illustrate the changes | |
| − | + | ** List of issues and omissions (keyed to the page and line number) | |
Revision as of 19:27, 5 October 2007
Contents
M&M Conference Call, October 5, 2007
(for more detail refer to meeting schedule)
Agenda
- Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana)
Attendees
Sarah Ryan, Jay Lyle, Dale Nelson, Ioana Singureanu
Agenda
- Editing Project Peer Review (Ioana)
The editing project is intended to address confusing, incorrect, incomplete guidance, omissions - in the core specifications (RIM and Vocabulary for now). This effort of editing the documentation should be an on-going, operational effort in the future. For now, the project team is attemptiong to fix problem with the existing materials.
- We need to agree on the criteria listed in the "RIM Assessment Document"
- Close the peer review of the "RIM Assessment Document" by Nov. 3rd
- Review the documents and provide the following:
- A copy of the original text with tracking turned on edits marked to illustrate the changes
- List of issues and omissions (keyed to the page and line number)
Open issue
If the semantics are clarified, how are those clarifications going to be verified in all the specification that use the clarified concepts?
Action Items:
Dale to provide Jay the WARTS materials.
