This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "CMHAFF call, Thursday, August 17"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
**'''[https://appcheck.de/kriterienkatalog GERMAN Assessment Criteria for health-related apps]''' These are mostly intended for developers to use in self-assessment, but the assessments also contain reviews by a third party. (UNASSIGNED)
 
**'''[https://appcheck.de/kriterienkatalog GERMAN Assessment Criteria for health-related apps]''' These are mostly intended for developers to use in self-assessment, but the assessments also contain reviews by a third party. (UNASSIGNED)
 
**'''[[File:National authorisation criteria of Finnish PHR v2.2 Nokia Translation.xlsx]]''' -- '''FINNISH''' National Authorisation (Certification) Criteria for PHR (unofficial translation into English)  Contains approximately 80 criteria in 6 categories. (NATHAN BOTTS)
 
**'''[[File:National authorisation criteria of Finnish PHR v2.2 Nokia Translation.xlsx]]''' -- '''FINNISH''' National Authorisation (Certification) Criteria for PHR (unofficial translation into English)  Contains approximately 80 criteria in 6 categories. (NATHAN BOTTS)
**'''[[File:Draft guidelines mhealth apps_not for publication_DTao_Comments.docx]]''' -- Draft mHealth Guidelines from a project not completed in EU (unpublished, not for distribution), with a mandate "to develop guidelines for assessing the validity and reliability of the data that health apps collect and process." While the project was never completed, there was a report on the work (UNASSIGNED)
+
**'''[[File:Draft guidelines mhealth apps_not for publication_DTao_Comments.docx]]''' -- Draft mHealth Guidelines from a project not completed in EU (unpublished, not for distribution), with a mandate "to develop guidelines for assessing the validity and reliability of the data that health apps collect and process." While the project was never completed, there was a report on the work (DAVID TAO -- done)
 
***'''[[File:ReportofmHealthWorkingGroup-June2017cleanpdf.pdf]]''' of which page 6 summarizes 13 categories for assessment that were discussed, of which six had a higher degree of consensus than others.  
 
***'''[[File:ReportofmHealthWorkingGroup-June2017cleanpdf.pdf]]''' of which page 6 summarizes 13 categories for assessment that were discussed, of which six had a higher degree of consensus than others.  
 
***'''[[File:Assessment Questionnaire.xlsx]]''' -- Assessment Questionnaire from a project not completed in EU (unpublished, not for distribution)
 
***'''[[File:Assessment Questionnaire.xlsx]]''' -- Assessment Questionnaire from a project not completed in EU (unpublished, not for distribution)

Revision as of 19:03, 14 August 2017

Attendees: ____

AGENDA:

  • TO BE ADDED
  • Review specific comments in latest draft File:CMHAFF STU Ballot Draft.docx
    • DKT4 decision tree
    • DKT6 levels of criticality -- if used, need clear definitions so developers can easily classify their apps
    • DKT22 reorganization of "Informing Users" section. Does it make sense?
    • DKT29-30 granularity vs precision -- are both needed?
    • DKT38-39 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
    • DKT41 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
    • DKT42-44 new "Interoperability" section
    • DKT50 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
    • DKT57 Should Windows platform considerations be included or not
  • Check status, set schedule for recommendations from additional European documents. Look for gaps (missing in cMHAFF, but within scope), or contradictions (recommendations that run counter to cMHAFF).