This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "CMHAFF call, Thursday, August 17"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: ____ AGENDA: *TO BE ADDED *Review specific comments in latest draft (TO BE MODIFIED -- UPDATE THE NUMBERS) **DKT4 decision tree **DKT6 levels of criticality -- if ...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
**DKT4 decision tree
 
**DKT4 decision tree
 
**DKT6 levels of criticality -- if used, need clear definitions so developers can easily classify their apps
 
**DKT6 levels of criticality -- if used, need clear definitions so developers can easily classify their apps
**DKT14  reference for "secure coding practices?"
+
**DKT21 reorganization of "Informing Users" section. Does it make sense?
**DKT30 granularity vs precision -- are both needed?
+
**DKT28-29 granularity vs precision -- are both needed?
**DKT39 and DKT40 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices?
+
**DKT37-38 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
**DKT42 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
+
**DKT40 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
**DKT43 new "Interoperability" section
+
**DKT41-43 new "Interoperability" section
**DKT51 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
+
**DKT49 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
**DKT56 Glossary: build it, or refer to external glossary?
+
**DKT56  Should Windows platform considerations be included or not
**DKT46 Should Windows platform considerations be included or not
 
 
*Check status, set schedule for recommendations from additional European documents. Look for gaps (missing in cMHAFF, but within scope), or contradictions (recommendations that run counter to cMHAFF).  
 
*Check status, set schedule for recommendations from additional European documents. Look for gaps (missing in cMHAFF, but within scope), or contradictions (recommendations that run counter to cMHAFF).  
 
**'''[[File:charismha_abr_v.01.1e-20160606 (003)_ENG SHORT VERSION.pdf]] -- GERMAN''' Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps" to compare to cMHAFF. (HARRY RHODES)
 
**'''[[File:charismha_abr_v.01.1e-20160606 (003)_ENG SHORT VERSION.pdf]] -- GERMAN''' Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps" to compare to cMHAFF. (HARRY RHODES)

Revision as of 15:34, 11 August 2017

Attendees: ____

AGENDA:

  • TO BE ADDED
  • Review specific comments in latest draft (TO BE MODIFIED -- UPDATE THE NUMBERS)
    • DKT4 decision tree
    • DKT6 levels of criticality -- if used, need clear definitions so developers can easily classify their apps
    • DKT21 reorganization of "Informing Users" section. Does it make sense?
    • DKT28-29 granularity vs precision -- are both needed?
    • DKT37-38 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
    • DKT40 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
    • DKT41-43 new "Interoperability" section
    • DKT49 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
    • DKT56 Should Windows platform considerations be included or not
  • Check status, set schedule for recommendations from additional European documents. Look for gaps (missing in cMHAFF, but within scope), or contradictions (recommendations that run counter to cMHAFF).