Difference between revisions of "May 2017 CBCC Working Group Meeting - Madrid, Spain"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
[[CBCC|Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings]] | [[CBCC|Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings]] | ||
− | 2017 – CBCC | + | ==2017 – CBCC Working Group Meeting, Madrid Spain== |
− | CBCC Monday Q3 | + | ===CBCC Monday Q3=== |
Attendees: | Attendees: | ||
− | David Pyke (david.pyke@readycomputing.com) | + | * David Pyke (david.pyke@readycomputing.com) |
− | Danielle Friend (dfriend@epic.com) | + | * Danielle Friend (dfriend@epic.com) |
− | Ardon Toonstra (a.Toonstra@furore.com | + | * Ardon Toonstra (a.Toonstra@furore.com |
− | Trish Williams (patricia.williams@flinders.edu.au) | + | * Trish Williams (patricia.williams@flinders.edu.au) |
− | John Moehrke (johnmoehrke@gmail.com) | + | * John Moehrke (johnmoehrke@gmail.com) |
− | Alexander Mense (mense@technikum-wien.at) | + | * Alexander Mense (mense@technikum-wien.at) |
− | Bernd Blobel (bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de) | + | * Bernd Blobel (bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de) |
− | Agenda: | + | '''Agenda:''' |
− | CBCC & Security | + | CBCC & Security Report Out |
− | International | + | International Report Out |
− | CBCC Report Out | + | '''CBCC Report Out''' |
SPIA Continues to be stalled until Mike Davis or appointee can take over as editor | SPIA Continues to be stalled until Mike Davis or appointee can take over as editor | ||
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
John Moehrke willing to be responsible for SPIA. Talk to Mike Davis to have it turned over or at least the most recent version submitted to the committee. | John Moehrke willing to be responsible for SPIA. Talk to Mike Davis to have it turned over or at least the most recent version submitted to the committee. | ||
− | FHIR Consent | + | '''FHIR Consent''' |
− | *Consent to share as stable as possible | + | * Consent to share as stable as possible |
− | *Advance Directive showing promise with several directives able to be covered without significant change | + | * Advance Directive showing promise with several directives able to be covered without significant change |
− | *Research stalled without input from BRR. DP to visit BRR to gain attendees | + | * Research stalled without input from BRR. DP to visit BRR to gain attendees |
− | *Treatment in initial stages | + | * Treatment in initial stages |
− | *Workflow to be covered this week with FHIR-I including potential for a ConsentRequest resource for gaining consent where none currently exists | + | * Workflow to be covered this week with FHIR-I including potential for a ConsentRequest resource for gaining consent where none currently exists |
− | Security Report out | + | '''Security Report out''' |
− | *Reconciliation of trust framework specification – taking place later – dynamically creating trust frameworks (possibly via policy) | + | * Reconciliation of trust framework specification – taking place later – dynamically creating trust frameworks (possibly via policy) |
− | *Only defined trust elements and framework | + | * Only defined trust elements and framework |
− | *Selection of policies | + | * Selection of policies |
− | + | '''FHIR Security''' | |
− | *Audit, Provenance, security labels Need test scenarios | + | * Audit, Provenance, security labels Need test scenarios |
− | *Some open issues | + | * Some open issues |
− | *Interest from use case regarding SUBSET regarding update | + | * Interest from use case regarding SUBSET regarding update |
− | *Two mechanisms – security tags and Summary | + | * Two mechanisms – security tags and Summary |
− | **How will server know if the push is the result of a subset, that missing are not to be removed – potential for profile/dynamic profile to manage | + | ** How will server know if the push is the result of a subset, that missing are not to be removed – potential for profile/dynamic profile to manage |
− | *How to request SUBSET (e.g., w/o gender or race) | + | * How to request SUBSET (e.g., w/o gender or race) |
− | **If message with SUBSET, how would be dealt with | + | ** If message with SUBSET, how would be dealt with |
− | **Redacted state for FHIR returned data | + | ** Redacted state for FHIR returned data |
− | **Purpose of use is potential use case | + | ** Purpose of use is potential use case |
− | **A profile that creates a subset is only one form of de-id, and that starts a bigger problem that may break profiles | + | ** A profile that creates a subset is only one form of de-id, and that starts a bigger problem that may break profiles |
− | *FHIR Data model is limiting and causing profiles to break the model | + | * FHIR Data model is limiting and causing profiles to break the model |
− | **ICT ontology should be examined as an issue (Bernd) | + | ** ICT ontology should be examined as an issue (Bernd) |
− | **SMART on FHIR and Oauth are moving into HL7. | + | ** SMART on FHIR and Oauth are moving into HL7. |
− | **FHIR-I is hosting, but Security is asking for comment | + | ** FHIR-I is hosting, but Security is asking for comment |
− | **Smart should not be seen as the one way. | + | ** Smart should not be seen as the one way. |
− | **Some constraints are in there but the meet only a subset of FHIR use-cases | + | ** Some constraints are in there but the meet only a subset of FHIR use-cases |
− | **Digital signature vocabulary only has ASTM as a source | + | ** Digital signature vocabulary only has ASTM as a source |
− | **Use ASTM to add to vocab despite ASTM no longer meeting or use HL7 vocabulary | + | ** Use ASTM to add to vocab despite ASTM no longer meeting or use HL7 vocabulary |
− | **DSG [IHE] is final text | + | ** DSG [IHE] is final text |
− | International report out | + | '''International report out''' |
Some work concluded regarding specifications | Some work concluded regarding specifications | ||
− | *ISO25237 Health info | + | * ISO25237 Health info Add to dictionary |
− | **Approved IS which has been published. | + | ** Approved IS which has been published. |
− | **Accepted for use by EU parliament | + | ** Accepted for use by EU parliament |
− | **Guidance on health information education | + | ** Guidance on health information education |
− | *ISO 21298 HI Functional and structural Roles | + | * ISO 21298 HI Functional and structural Roles |
− | **Organizational relationships | + | ** Organizational relationships |
− | **Functional relationships | + | ** Functional relationships |
− | **Global overview how assignments are in various countries | + | ** Global overview how assignments are in various countries |
− | **Includes international coding | + | ** Includes international coding |
*PKI 17090 Part 5 using PKI creds – Launched by Japan | *PKI 17090 Part 5 using PKI creds – Launched by Japan | ||
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
Attendees: | Attendees: | ||
− | David Pyke | + | * David Pyke, Co-chair |
− | Ed Hammond | + | *Ed Hammond |
− | Hideyuki Miyohara | + | *Hideyuki Miyohara |
− | David Booth | + | *David Booth |
− | Richard Esmark | + | *Richard Esmark |
− | Trish Williams | + | *Trish Williams |
− | Alexander Mense | + | *Alexander Mense |
− | Mark Shafarman | + | *Mark Shafarman |
− | Pat Van Dyke | + | *Pat Van Dyke |
− | Steve Hofnagel | + | *Steve Hofnagel |
− | Gora Datta | + | *Gora Datta |
− | Bernd Blobel | + | *Bernd Blobel |
− | Kathleen Connor | + | *Kathleen Connor |
− | Stan Huff | + | *Stan Huff |
− | Susan Matney | + | *Susan Matney |
− | Galen Mulrooney | + | *Galen Mulrooney |
− | David Booth | + | *David Booth |
− | Claude Nanjo | + | *Claude Nanjo |
− | Lori Reed-Forquet | + | *Lori Reed-Forquet |
− | Nancy Orvis | + | *Nancy Orvis |
− | Muhammad Asim | + | *Muhammad Asim |
Coverage of the Trust Framework was minimal due to large numbers of questions on the base concept of Ontological-based system design. Examples and more detail to be added to the presentation deck | Coverage of the Trust Framework was minimal due to large numbers of questions on the base concept of Ontological-based system design. Examples and more detail to be added to the presentation deck | ||
− | Tuesday Q2 | + | ===Tuesday Q2=== |
+ | No Quorum | ||
− | Tuesday Q3 | + | ===Tuesday Q3=== |
Attendees: | Attendees: | ||
− | Hideyuki Miyohara | + | * David Pyke, Co-chair |
− | William Jones | + | *Hideyuki Miyohara |
− | Alexander Mense | + | *William Jones |
− | Reinherd Egelkraut | + | *Alexander Mense |
− | Karl Wolzer(?) | + | *Reinherd Egelkraut |
− | Matthew Graham | + | *Karl Wolzer(?) |
− | John Moehrke | + | *Matthew Graham |
− | Frank Ploeg | + | *John Moehrke |
− | Gora Datta | + | *Frank Ploeg |
+ | *Gora Datta | ||
*Mobile Health – cMHAFF update (Presentation deck to be attached) | *Mobile Health – cMHAFF update (Presentation deck to be attached) | ||
Line 320: | Line 322: | ||
**Trust frameworks may be needed and calculated. Adds social and environment aspects | **Trust frameworks may be needed and calculated. Adds social and environment aspects | ||
− | Tuesday Q4 | + | ===Tuesday Q4=== |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | '''CBCC FHIR Consent Issues''' | ||
+ | *FHIR Consent Issures | ||
**Creation possibilities for ConsentRequest resource and mapping to handle use care for gaining treatment or other consent where not existing, across organisations | **Creation possibilities for ConsentRequest resource and mapping to handle use care for gaining treatment or other consent where not existing, across organisations | ||
− | Wednesday Q2 | + | ===Wednesday Q2 === |
Attendees | Attendees | ||
− | David Hay | + | * David Pyke, Co-chair |
− | Ardon Toonstra | + | *David Hay |
− | Alexander Henket | + | *Ardon Toonstra |
+ | *Alexander Henket | ||
*FHIR Consent Comment Resolution | *FHIR Consent Comment Resolution | ||
Line 337: | Line 340: | ||
**Discussed potential for source to link to physical location, awaiting use case to see if actually needed. Potential to have location added to document reference or attachment type | **Discussed potential for source to link to physical location, awaiting use case to see if actually needed. Potential to have location added to document reference or attachment type | ||
− | Wednesday Q3 | + | ===Wednesday Q3 === |
+ | No quorum | ||
− | Wednesday Q4 | + | ===Wednesday Q4=== |
Attendees | Attendees | ||
− | John Moehrke | + | * David Pyke, Co-chair |
− | Marten Smits | + | *John Moehrke |
− | Ashley Duncan | + | *Marten Smits |
+ | *Ashley Duncan | ||
− | FHIR Consent review | + | '''FHIR Consent review''' |
Reviewed comments: | Reviewed comments: | ||
*12666 (Add Consent V2 mappings) | *12666 (Add Consent V2 mappings) |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 20 June 2017
Contents
DRAFT 2017 May Working Group Meeting - Madrid, Spain - CBCC WORKING GROUP
Community Based Collaborative Care (CBCC) WORKING GROUP SESSIONS
Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Day | Date | Qtr | Time | AGENDA ITEMS | Session Leader | Room |
SUN | MAY 07 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 | No Meeting | . | |
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q3 | 1:45 -3:00 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q4 | 3:30 -5:00 | No Meeting | . | |||
MON | MAY 08 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 | No Meeting | . | |
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q3/ Q4 | 1:45 -3:00 / 3:30-5:00 | @CBCC Joint CBCC-Security
New Joint Project review, (if any)
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
TUE | MAY 09 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 | No Meeting | . | . |
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 |
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
Q3 | 1:45-3:00 | @CBCC Joint w/Security, Mobile Health
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
Q4 | 3:30 - 5:00 | @CBCC Joint w/FHIR Infrastructure
|
. | Room TBD | ||
Q5 | 5:15-6:15 | Birds of a Feather: | . | Room TBD | ||
Q5 | 5:15-6:15 | Birds of a Feather: | . | Room TBD | ||
WED | MAY 10 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 split-meeting | @EHR Joint w/Security, CBCC, SOA, FHIR
See EHR Agenda for topics Electronic Health Records Hosting |
EHR Hosting | Room TBD |
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 | @CBCC Joint w/FHIR Infrastructure
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
Q3 | 1:45 -3:00 |
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
Q4 | 3:30 -5:00 |
|
CBCC | Room TBD | ||
THU | MAY 11 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 | @Security Joint CBCC-Security | ||
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q3 | 1:45 - 3:00 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q4 | 3:30 - 5:00 | No Meeting | . | |||
FRI | MAY 12 | Q1 | 9:00-10:30 | No Meeting | . | |
Q2 | 11:00-12:30 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q3 | 1:45 -3:00 | No Meeting | . | |||
Q4 | 3:30 -5:00 | No Meeting | . |
Q1=9:00 – 10:30 am; Q2=11:00 – 12:30 pm; Q3=1:45 – 3:00 pm; Q4=3:30 – 5:00 pm
Meeting Minutes Draft
2017 – CBCC Working Group Meeting, Madrid Spain
CBCC Monday Q3
Attendees:
- David Pyke (david.pyke@readycomputing.com)
- Danielle Friend (dfriend@epic.com)
- Ardon Toonstra (a.Toonstra@furore.com
- Trish Williams (patricia.williams@flinders.edu.au)
- John Moehrke (johnmoehrke@gmail.com)
- Alexander Mense (mense@technikum-wien.at)
- Bernd Blobel (bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de)
Agenda: CBCC & Security Report Out International Report Out
CBCC Report Out
SPIA Continues to be stalled until Mike Davis or appointee can take over as editor
John Moehrke willing to be responsible for SPIA. Talk to Mike Davis to have it turned over or at least the most recent version submitted to the committee.
FHIR Consent
- Consent to share as stable as possible
- Advance Directive showing promise with several directives able to be covered without significant change
- Research stalled without input from BRR. DP to visit BRR to gain attendees
- Treatment in initial stages
- Workflow to be covered this week with FHIR-I including potential for a ConsentRequest resource for gaining consent where none currently exists
Security Report out
- Reconciliation of trust framework specification – taking place later – dynamically creating trust frameworks (possibly via policy)
- Only defined trust elements and framework
- Selection of policies
FHIR Security
- Audit, Provenance, security labels Need test scenarios
- Some open issues
- Interest from use case regarding SUBSET regarding update
- Two mechanisms – security tags and Summary
- How will server know if the push is the result of a subset, that missing are not to be removed – potential for profile/dynamic profile to manage
- How to request SUBSET (e.g., w/o gender or race)
- If message with SUBSET, how would be dealt with
- Redacted state for FHIR returned data
- Purpose of use is potential use case
- A profile that creates a subset is only one form of de-id, and that starts a bigger problem that may break profiles
- FHIR Data model is limiting and causing profiles to break the model
- ICT ontology should be examined as an issue (Bernd)
- SMART on FHIR and Oauth are moving into HL7.
- FHIR-I is hosting, but Security is asking for comment
- Smart should not be seen as the one way.
- Some constraints are in there but the meet only a subset of FHIR use-cases
- Digital signature vocabulary only has ASTM as a source
- Use ASTM to add to vocab despite ASTM no longer meeting or use HL7 vocabulary
- DSG [IHE] is final text
International report out
Some work concluded regarding specifications
- ISO25237 Health info Add to dictionary
- Approved IS which has been published.
- Accepted for use by EU parliament
- Guidance on health information education
- ISO 21298 HI Functional and structural Roles
- Organizational relationships
- Functional relationships
- Global overview how assignments are in various countries
- Includes international coding
- PKI 17090 Part 5 using PKI creds – Launched by Japan
- Completing the framework
- Tooling underway
- TC215 WG4 extended scope to new technology
- Cloud – usage, risk assessment, frameworks
- TS11633 Remote for medical devices (Japan)
- Not ready for publication
- Framework stated 2008, Published by TR.
- Audit trail 27789 changed relationship with DICOM and HL7
- DICOM passed audit trail proposal with part 16 with vocabulary fixes
- Part 15 added patient record or codes same implementation model
- Supplement 95 incorporated
- System review attempted start to discuss ADA
CBCC Monday Q4 Presentation by Bernd Blobel on Ontology based standards and effect on current Trust Framework work by Security (to be attached, Kathleen video/audio recorded)
Attendees:
- David Pyke, Co-chair
- Ed Hammond
- Hideyuki Miyohara
- David Booth
- Richard Esmark
- Trish Williams
- Alexander Mense
- Mark Shafarman
- Pat Van Dyke
- Steve Hofnagel
- Gora Datta
- Bernd Blobel
- Kathleen Connor
- Stan Huff
- Susan Matney
- Galen Mulrooney
- David Booth
- Claude Nanjo
- Lori Reed-Forquet
- Nancy Orvis
- Muhammad Asim
Coverage of the Trust Framework was minimal due to large numbers of questions on the base concept of Ontological-based system design. Examples and more detail to be added to the presentation deck
Tuesday Q2
No Quorum
Tuesday Q3
Attendees:
- David Pyke, Co-chair
- Hideyuki Miyohara
- William Jones
- Alexander Mense
- Reinherd Egelkraut
- Karl Wolzer(?)
- Matthew Graham
- John Moehrke
- Frank Ploeg
- Gora Datta
- Mobile Health – cMHAFF update (Presentation deck to be attached)
- 200,00 Consumer Heath Apps, 90% in question, 12% potentially deadly
- MH looking for assistance on what to add for privacy/security
- Consensus on who cMHAFF was for is missing. Large amounts are US only. It was moved back to the reliability and safety of exchanged data.
- Mheath subset of the EU eHealth requested that MH stops work and moved to mHealth. All publication stopped.
- Guidelines were considered suggestions for app developers entering the space. Consumer decides if they want to use the app.
- Moving to a conceptual framework. Has an aspirational aspect for app development
- Would like guidance for concepts and terms for risk assessment for privacy and security. What are the layers for best/moderate/minimal adherence
- Certification standards exist, created with Privacy by Design, risk based security
- App devs, users may not care when recommending
- Trust frameworks may be needed and calculated. Adds social and environment aspects
Tuesday Q4
CBCC FHIR Consent Issues
- FHIR Consent Issures
- Creation possibilities for ConsentRequest resource and mapping to handle use care for gaining treatment or other consent where not existing, across organisations
Wednesday Q2
Attendees
- David Pyke, Co-chair
- David Hay
- Ardon Toonstra
- Alexander Henket
- FHIR Consent Comment Resolution
- Reviewed comments: 12666, 13313, 13358, 13360, 13361
- Discussed potential for source to link to physical location, awaiting use case to see if actually needed. Potential to have location added to document reference or attachment type
Wednesday Q3
No quorum
Wednesday Q4
Attendees
- David Pyke, Co-chair
- John Moehrke
- Marten Smits
- Ashley Duncan
FHIR Consent review Reviewed comments:
- 12666 (Add Consent V2 mappings)
- Test mappings added. Further review at the Weekly meetings
13313 (Add note / comment to Consent)*
- Awaiting use case
- 13358 (Make Policy and PolicyRule a codeableconcept instead of URI)
- Implementers confused by the two example links, recommended to change
- Further review at Weekly meeting
13360 (Remove invariant “Either a Policy or PolicyRule”)
- Unlikely due to requirement for consent. Further review required.
13361 (Add option to allow for specifying whether a consent was verified by the patient or his/her family))
- Useful for all treatment and advanced directives
- Voted to accept 13361 4-0-0