This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CIMI WGM Agenda May 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MulrooneyG (talk | contribs) (Original Page) |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<td rowspan=2>PM</td> | <td rowspan=2>PM</td> | ||
<td>Q3</td> | <td>Q3</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td>Welcome and Agenda Review | + | <td>Welcome and Agenda Review, CIMI Overview</td> |
− | |||
− | |||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Stan</td> | ||
+ | <td>Richard</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td> |
− | + | *FHIM discussion with implementers | |
− | + | *Ballot Reconcilliation | |
+ | </td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Stan</td> | ||
+ | <td>Galen</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 76: | Line 79: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Munich</td> |
− | <td> @ Patient Care (skin breakdown) </td> | + | <td> @ Patient Care (skin breakdown, allergies/adverse reactions) </td> |
<td>Patient Care</td> | <td>Patient Care</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 86: | Line 89: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q2</td> | <td>Q2</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
<td>FHIM Coordination</td> | <td>FHIM Coordination</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Galen</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Richard</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td rowspan=3>PM </td><td>lunch</td> | <td rowspan=3>PM </td><td>lunch</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Marsella</td> |
− | <td>Lunch with FHIR: CIMI FHIR profile governance & coordination across groups</td> | + | <td>Lunch with FHIR: CIMI FHIR profile governance & coordination across groups |
+ | * Report that the CIMI datatypes now map one-to-one with the FHIR datatypes | ||
+ | * Describe the plan for the CIIC meeting to be held at NIH on July 13 | ||
+ | * Our plans for the September ballot | ||
+ | </td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td>FHIR-I</td> | <td>FHIR-I</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Stan</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Galen</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q3</td> | <td>Q3</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td>Tooling Discussion |
− | + | * Discuss tools and tooling, including what Claude is doing, VA tools, Intermountain tools, MDHT, CAMEO (Mark Kramer), etc. | |
− | + | </td> | |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Richard</td> | ||
+ | <td>Galen</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Estrasburgo</td> |
− | <td> @ Patient Care (negation) </td> | + | <td> @ Patient Care (negation, and other topics of joint interest) </td> |
<td>Patient Care</td> | <td>Patient Care</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 140: | Line 149: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Estrasburgo</td> |
− | <td> @ CQI </td> | + | <td> @ CQI |
+ | * status updates, alignment with QDM and CIMI coverage of VMR content | ||
+ | * discuss KNART PSS | ||
+ | * Discussion of using CIMI as a model for the KNARTs - Perhaps this is a separate PSS? | ||
+ | </td> | ||
<td>CQI</td> | <td>CQI</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 150: | Line 163: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q2</td> | <td>Q2</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Frankfurt</td> |
− | <td> @ CIC | + | <td> @ CIC |
+ | * Next steps for integrating the Data Elements into CIMI models | ||
+ | * How to support DE->FHIR project | ||
+ | * How CIC DAMs relate to CIMI | ||
+ | </td> | ||
<td>CIC</td> | <td>CIC</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 160: | Line 177: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td rowspan=2>PM </td> | <td rowspan=2>PM </td> | ||
− | <td>Q3</td> | + | <td >[[#Wednesday_Q3 | Q3]]</td> |
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td>Semantics for Assertion & Evaluation. Review of Vital Signs Profile(s)</td> |
− | |||
− | |||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Jay</td> | ||
+ | <td>Richard</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Burdeos</td> |
− | <td> @ CDS </td> | + | <td> @ CDS |
+ | * alignment with the Topic/Context pattern, how they'll be used in knowledge artifacts, generation of FHIR Profiles for DCMs and how they'd be used in CDS services | ||
+ | </td> | ||
<td>CDS</td> | <td>CDS</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 195: | Line 214: | ||
<td rowspan=2>AM </td> | <td rowspan=2>AM </td> | ||
<td>Q1</td> | <td>Q1</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td>Ballot Reconcilliation</td> |
− | |||
− | |||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Richard</td> | ||
+ | <td>Galen</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q2</td> | <td>Q2</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td> |
− | + | *Ballot Reconcilliation | |
− | + | *Discusss relationship between "Models of Meaning" vs "Models of Use" - "Topic" - and Ontology/Description Logic | |
+ | *How does LEGO question/answer relate to CIMI?</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Richard</td> | ||
+ | <td>Galen</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 216: | Line 238: | ||
<td rowspan=2>PM</td> | <td rowspan=2>PM</td> | ||
<td>Q3</td> | <td>Q3</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Alcudia</td> |
− | <td> @ Vocabulary </td> | + | <td> @ Vocabulary |
+ | * Discuss CIMI SNOMED CT namespace | ||
+ | * what edition should people start from? | ||
+ | * binding policies, procedures, semantics | ||
+ | </td> | ||
<td>Vocabulary</td> | <td>Vocabulary</td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
Line 226: | Line 252: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Q4</td> | <td>Q4</td> | ||
− | <td></td> | + | <td>Almagro</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td> |
− | + | *September Ballot Planning | |
− | + | *How do we prioritize outside requests for CIMI models / outreach</td> | |
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
+ | <td>Stan</td> | ||
+ | <td>Steve H</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 290: | Line 318: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Wednesday Q3=== | ||
+ | Attendees | ||
+ | * | ||
+ | Review of Vitals effort | ||
+ | * Susan collecting requirements | ||
+ | * A vitals archetype is just another observation that happens to be in one (or more) panels called 'Vitals' | ||
+ | * Fractal edges: SpO2 can be done with "room air" or "on O2" but not with all the devices, rate, %, ventilator settings, etc. If we do this one, it will probably be a lite version. | ||
+ | Jay began presenting proposal for semantic alignment of assertion & evaluation patterns | ||
+ | * Vehement discussion of whether we should support isosemanticity ensued; topic not broached |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 10 May 2017
Return to Clinical_Information_Modeling_Initiative_Work_Group main page
Agenda
Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair/Lead | Scribe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monday May 8 |
AM | Q1 | NOT MEETING | |||||
Q2 | NOT MEETING | |||||||
PM | Q3 | Almagro | Welcome and Agenda Review, CIMI Overview | Stan | Richard | |||
Q4 | Almagro |
|
Stan | Galen | ||||
Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair/Lead | Scribe | |
Tuesday May 9 |
AM | Q1 | Munich | @ Patient Care (skin breakdown, allergies/adverse reactions) | Patient Care | (Pt Care) | n/a | |
Q2 | Almagro | FHIM Coordination | Galen | Richard | ||||
PM | lunch | Marsella | Lunch with FHIR: CIMI FHIR profile governance & coordination across groups
|
FHIR-I | Stan | Galen | ||
Q3 | Almagro | Tooling Discussion
|
Richard | Galen | ||||
Q4 | Estrasburgo | @ Patient Care (negation, and other topics of joint interest) | Patient Care | (Pt Care) | n/a | |||
Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair/Lead | Scribe | |
Wednesday May 10 |
AM | Q1 | Estrasburgo | @ CQI
|
CQI | (CQI) | n/a | |
Q2 | Frankfurt | @ CIC
|
CIC | (CIC) | n/a | |||
PM | Q3 | Almagro | Semantics for Assertion & Evaluation. Review of Vital Signs Profile(s) | Jay | Richard | |||
Q4 | Burdeos | @ CDS
|
CDS | (CDS) | n/a | |||
Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair/Lead | Scribe | |
Thursday May 11 |
AM | Q1 | Almagro | Ballot Reconcilliation | Richard | Galen | ||
Q2 | Almagro |
|
Richard | Galen | ||||
PM | Q3 | Alcudia | @ Vocabulary
|
Vocabulary | (Vocabulary) | n/a | ||
Q4 | Almagro |
|
Stan | Steve H | ||||
Day | Time | Room | Event | Host | Joining | Chair/Lead | Scribe | |
Friday May 12 |
AM | Q1 | NOT MEETING | |||||
Q2 | NOT MEETING | |||||||
PM | Q3 | NOT MEETING | ||||||
Q4 | NOT MEETING |
Wednesday Q3
Attendees
Review of Vitals effort
- Susan collecting requirements
- A vitals archetype is just another observation that happens to be in one (or more) panels called 'Vitals'
- Fractal edges: SpO2 can be done with "room air" or "on O2" but not with all the devices, rate, %, ventilator settings, etc. If we do this one, it will probably be a lite version.
Jay began presenting proposal for semantic alignment of assertion & evaluation patterns
- Vehement discussion of whether we should support isosemanticity ensued; topic not broached