Difference between revisions of "FHIR Infrastructure Minutes WGM 201705"
Josh mandel (talk | contribs) |
Ron Shapiro (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:2017 FHIR Infrastructure Minutes | + | [[Category:2017 FHIR Infrastructure Minutes]] |
| − | + | =FHIR Infrastructure 2017 May Madrid WGM Minutes= | |
| − | =FHIR Infrastructure | ||
| − | |||
[[:Category:2017 FHIR Infrastructure Minutes|Return to FHIR Infrastructure Minutes]] | [[:Category:2017 FHIR Infrastructure Minutes|Return to FHIR Infrastructure Minutes]] | ||
| + | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | * | + | * see [[FHIR_Agenda_201705_WGM]] |
| − | |||
==Mon Q2== | ==Mon Q2== | ||
Revision as of 15:17, 8 May 2017
Contents
FHIR Infrastructure 2017 May Madrid WGM Minutes
Return to FHIR Infrastructure Minutes
Agenda
Mon Q2
Adjournment
Mon Q3
Chair: Josh Mandel
Minutes: Christiaan Knaap
Smart App Launch specification, part of FHIR
https://github.com/smart-on-fhir/smart-on-fhir.github.io
See branch into-hl7
Send in issues on the repo for amendments or changes
Planning: work through it, ballot it in September http://bit.ly/argo-auth
How is this related to CDS Hooks? It would enable presenting relevant app functionality based on the context (e.g. a diagnosis the clinician is typing is).
Just EHR -> App? That is the abstraction: app just accesses the 'EHR' being one FHIR endpoint. Under the hood multiple servers and services (FHIR and OAuth2) may be involved.
Open issues:
Filter: RWG: FHIR-I, Status: any open, Group: Discuss at WGM
GF#8776 Chris gives an overview. Links to searching through a tree, and to searching through a chain. Also relates to a closure in a vocabulary search (with an 'is-a' traversal) This limits to a 'partOf' element, so a relation to itself.
It looks like comparable concepts for Url (simple) and Token (that requires terminology evaluation). More generic solutions: add expressions to say how many levels you want to descend. Chris has implemented it just for 'partOf' relations. Circularity means an error. Go further: · mention in the SearchParameter somehow if this is possible for that parameter. · try it in a connectathon
GF#5173
Is-Modifier
Idea: keep it, but add a property to the concept itself stating whether it actually modifies meaning. Problem: some concepts are used in different places, with different meaning (most notably: boolean)
Resolution filed.
