This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-04-14 Learning Health Systems Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
* Stephen reviewed [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/6/65/Care_Plan-Care_Team_WIP_Value_Sets_2017-04-07.xlsx Care_Plan-Care_Team_WIP_Value_Sets_2017-04-07.xlsx], specifically the "CP.category-Domain" tab | * Stephen reviewed [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/6/65/Care_Plan-Care_Team_WIP_Value_Sets_2017-04-07.xlsx Care_Plan-Care_Team_WIP_Value_Sets_2017-04-07.xlsx], specifically the "CP.category-Domain" tab | ||
** Lisa said that the green tabs are focused on CarePlan categorization whereas blue tabs are focused on CareTeam categorization | ** Lisa said that the green tabs are focused on CarePlan categorization whereas blue tabs are focused on CareTeam categorization | ||
| − | ** Lisa's hypothesis was that the categorizations may be similar between CareTeam and CarePlan (e.g. focus, domain, nature, setting) - and Russ agreed | + | ** Lisa's hypothesis was that the categorizations may be similar between CareTeam and CarePlan (e.g. focus, domain, nature, setting) - and Russ agreed and thought maybe CarePlan might be more specific than CareTeam |
** Michelle said that the Cerner examples manifest as CareTeam.participant.roles, not categories at the broader level | ** Michelle said that the Cerner examples manifest as CareTeam.participant.roles, not categories at the broader level | ||
** Discussion about specificity needed within "CP.category-Domain" -- Stephen felt some were too specific whereas Lisa suggested we start with the full list because we can always roll up to a higher level (e.g. using SNOMED hierarchy), but if we only support higher level terms then we can't get more specific. | ** Discussion about specificity needed within "CP.category-Domain" -- Stephen felt some were too specific whereas Lisa suggested we start with the full list because we can always roll up to a higher level (e.g. using SNOMED hierarchy), but if we only support higher level terms then we can't get more specific. | ||
Revision as of 20:41, 14 April 2017
| Facilitator | Russell Leftwich | Note taker(s) | Michelle Miller |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| X | Russell Leftwich | InterSystems | |
| John Roberts | Tennessee Department of Health | ||
| X | Stephen Chu | Individual | |
| Evelyn Gallego | ONC | ||
| Kathy Walsh | LabCorp | ||
| Asim Muhammad | Philips Research Europe | ||
| Laura Heermann-Langford | Intermountain Healthcare | ||
| X | Emma Jones | Allscripts | |
| Jeff Brown | Cancerlinq | ||
| X | Lisa Nelson | Individual | |
| Dave Carlson | VA | ||
| Chris Melo | Phillips Healthcare | ||
| X | Michele Miller | Cerner | |
| Benjamin Kummer | Columbia University | ||
| Matt Rhan | |||
| Michael Padula | |||
| X | Lisa Gonzalez | ||
Minutes
- Chair: Russell Leftwich
- Scribe: Michelle Miller
- Motion to approve previous call minutes, 2017-04-07_Learning_Health_Systems_Call: Stephen/Lisa Nelson
- Stephen reviewed Care_Plan-Care_Team_WIP_Value_Sets_2017-04-07.xlsx, specifically the "CP.category-Domain" tab
- Lisa said that the green tabs are focused on CarePlan categorization whereas blue tabs are focused on CareTeam categorization
- Lisa's hypothesis was that the categorizations may be similar between CareTeam and CarePlan (e.g. focus, domain, nature, setting) - and Russ agreed and thought maybe CarePlan might be more specific than CareTeam
- Michelle said that the Cerner examples manifest as CareTeam.participant.roles, not categories at the broader level
- Discussion about specificity needed within "CP.category-Domain" -- Stephen felt some were too specific whereas Lisa suggested we start with the full list because we can always roll up to a higher level (e.g. using SNOMED hierarchy), but if we only support higher level terms then we can't get more specific.
