Difference between revisions of "20170406 OO FHIR conCall"
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
Issue raised by Grahame re the ProcedureRequest.category codes and suggested that they should be more like Observation.category. | Issue raised by Grahame re the ProcedureRequest.category codes and suggested that they should be more like Observation.category. | ||
| − | See comparison chart [[media:compare-cats.xlsx here]] | + | See comparison chart [[media:compare-cats.xlsx|here]] |
DR and Obs should be the same - existing tracker [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=11963&start=0 #11963] | DR and Obs should be the same - existing tracker [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=11963&start=0 #11963] | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 6 April 2017
| HL7 OO on FHIR (for Orders and Observations) Call in details: |
Date: 2017/04/06 2015 - 02:00 PM (Eastern Time, GMT -04 DST) | |
| Quorum = chair + 4 no | ||
| Co chairs | Chair | Notetaker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riki Merrick | |||
| Rob Hausam | X | ||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Patrick Lloyd | |||
| Ken McKaslin | |||
| Hans Buitendijk |
| Attendees | |
|---|---|
| X | Eric Haas |
| Riki Merrick | |
| Hans Buitendijk | |
| Jose Costa-Teixicara | |
| Dan Rusk | |
| Jonathan Harber | |
| David Burgess | |
| Lloyd McKenzie | |
| X | Rob Hausam |
| Andrea Pitkus | |
| Francois Marcary | |
| Robert Dieterle | |
| Marti V | |
| Ron Shapiro | |
| Kathy Walsh | |
| Todd Cooper | |
| Cindy Johns | |
| Bob Miius | |
Contents
- Roll Call
- Agenda
- Trackers for DiagnosticReport.
- Review what missing from use cases and keeping this resource from progressing to FMM = 4
e.g., how to represent complex AP reporting using DR vs other options.
Tracker 13169
Since only RH and I present, decided to focus on vocab related tracker
From original GForge that triggered the performer type identified:
- responsible
- author
- verifier
- etc.
From V3 participation type code system have
* RESP responsible party * AUT author (originator) * VRF verifier
Propose create as a starter valueset as extensible
Rob to start chat on Zulip to clarify the FHIR-wide guidelines for using V3 codes vs creating friendlier FHIR codes.
See notes in tracker.
Looking at categoy codes in ProcedureRequest vs DiagnosticReport vs Observation
Issue raised by Grahame re the ProcedureRequest.category codes and suggested that they should be more like Observation.category.
See comparison chart here
DR and Obs should be the same - existing tracker #11963
Looking at procedure categories on Google led to ICD-10PCS and CPT which were not helpful.
Need to establish the use case for why the procedure category would change operational behavior? It was introduced as part of merging DiagnosticOrder and ProcedureRequest to enable backwards compatability and if there was a need to differentiate the orders. It is also useful for searching.
AP Reporting
See example report
Options:
- DR.presentedForm as pdf etc
- simplest
- unstructured
- Sections in Composition ( ie a static document )
- Create and reference Observations in DR.results
- Possibly narrative-only or .valueString
- LOINCs...
- New elements in DR
- Draft mappings to see gaps in DR and what is needed
Back to OO_on_FHIR
