Difference between revisions of "AID 20161123 Teleconference"
Astechishin (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
AS updated on the request for FHIR core to more deeply integrate the Sunday AID presentations into the FHIR connectathon. AS will again send his emails to the track leads and we will look towards more engagement on the Saturday and Sunday morning. JA will do some canvassing during the connectathon to help fill any holes in the agenda for Sunday afternoon. | AS updated on the request for FHIR core to more deeply integrate the Sunday AID presentations into the FHIR connectathon. AS will again send his emails to the track leads and we will look towards more engagement on the Saturday and Sunday morning. JA will do some canvassing during the connectathon to help fill any holes in the agenda for Sunday afternoon. | ||
| − | + | RS stated the we can be more successful by being more structured about announcing speakers, providing good descriptions of the talks, and posting announcements (cross-post to other lists). RS has on occassion (mis)used the co-chairs list to make announcements of the agenda. | |
==Post WGM - Next Cycle== | ==Post WGM - Next Cycle== | ||
| − | JA will be at Apps for Health and we will look at planning and getting an out of cycle to happen. Likely will be late April for the event. | + | JA will be at Apps for Health and we will look at planning and getting an out of cycle to happen. Likely will be late April for the event. AS and JA will coordinate to get approval of the out of cycle at San Antonio. |
==AID Strategy== | ==AID Strategy== | ||
| − | What is the value of speaking to AID | + | |
| + | The group discussed how AID is still relevant and how to increase participation. What is the value of speaking to AID: | ||
* wider audience | * wider audience | ||
* video? | * video? | ||
JA ideas - need to be the venue to showcase what they are building (RS careful about showcase as a sales pitch) | JA ideas - need to be the venue to showcase what they are building (RS careful about showcase as a sales pitch) | ||
| − | + | RS goal is to tease out best practices and write up white papers. Session on Sunday to talk about for instance Persistence, AS suggested a panel discussion. This would look to engender engagement and work toward producing whitepapers. AS will investigate the panel members and look towards working out a plan. | |
| + | |||
| + | AIDs goals are: | ||
| + | * Facilitate the exchange of implementation experiences | ||
| + | * Provide feedback to standards development | ||
| + | * Marketing of successfull implementation of HL7 standards | ||
| − | + | JA sees the WG as shifting from documenting best practises to fostering community, FHIR.org does not organize meetings. Does this apply to other standards? For instance, where is the Zulip for CDA? AS will add this as a discussion on Monday Q3, RS will start a discussion thread on the FHIR Zulip about taking the lessons learned from FHIR back to our other standards communities. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | JA | + | ==Future Teleconferences== |
| + | Both JA and RS agreed that the teleconference was useful and were fine with scheduling another planning session between San Antonio and Madrid and between Madrid and San Diego. | ||
Meeting adjourned at 12:51 PM Eastern | Meeting adjourned at 12:51 PM Eastern | ||
Latest revision as of 00:36, 27 November 2016
These are the minutes of the agenda of the AID HL7 'user group'
Contents
AID Teleconference - November 23, 2016
| HL7 AID Meeting Minutes | Date: 2016-11-23 | ||
| Facilitator: Andy Stechishin | Note taker(s): Andy Stechishin | ||
| Present | Name | Init | Affiliation |
| × | Rene Spronk | RS | Ringholm |
| × | James Agnew | JA | UHN |
| × | Andy Stechishin | AS | CANA Software & Services |
| Quorum Requirements Met: Yes | |||
Agenda
- Role call and agenda
- Planning for San Antonio WGM
- Planning for Next Cycle after San Antonio
Meeting called to order 12:05 AM Eastern
Planning for San Antonio WGM
AS updated on the request for FHIR core to more deeply integrate the Sunday AID presentations into the FHIR connectathon. AS will again send his emails to the track leads and we will look towards more engagement on the Saturday and Sunday morning. JA will do some canvassing during the connectathon to help fill any holes in the agenda for Sunday afternoon.
RS stated the we can be more successful by being more structured about announcing speakers, providing good descriptions of the talks, and posting announcements (cross-post to other lists). RS has on occassion (mis)used the co-chairs list to make announcements of the agenda.
Post WGM - Next Cycle
JA will be at Apps for Health and we will look at planning and getting an out of cycle to happen. Likely will be late April for the event. AS and JA will coordinate to get approval of the out of cycle at San Antonio.
AID Strategy
The group discussed how AID is still relevant and how to increase participation. What is the value of speaking to AID:
- wider audience
- video?
JA ideas - need to be the venue to showcase what they are building (RS careful about showcase as a sales pitch) RS goal is to tease out best practices and write up white papers. Session on Sunday to talk about for instance Persistence, AS suggested a panel discussion. This would look to engender engagement and work toward producing whitepapers. AS will investigate the panel members and look towards working out a plan.
AIDs goals are:
- Facilitate the exchange of implementation experiences
- Provide feedback to standards development
- Marketing of successfull implementation of HL7 standards
JA sees the WG as shifting from documenting best practises to fostering community, FHIR.org does not organize meetings. Does this apply to other standards? For instance, where is the Zulip for CDA? AS will add this as a discussion on Monday Q3, RS will start a discussion thread on the FHIR Zulip about taking the lessons learned from FHIR back to our other standards communities.
Future Teleconferences
Both JA and RS agreed that the teleconference was useful and were fine with scheduling another planning session between San Antonio and Madrid and between Madrid and San Diego.
Meeting adjourned at 12:51 PM Eastern
