Difference between revisions of "Patient Care FHIR Call Template"

Revision as of 16:27, 27 September 2016

Patient Care FHIR Resources Conference Call Location: Conference Call Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377 WebEx: https://cerner.webex.com/cerner/j.php?MTID=mfc8969c4f77244480beee61d31385e79		Date: 2016-MM-DD Time: 5-6:30pm ET
Facilitator	Michelle M Miller	Note taker(s)	Michelle M Miller

Attendee	Name	Affiliation
	Elaine Ayres	NIH/Department of Clinical Research Informatics
	Stephen Chu
	Eric Haas	Haas Consulting
	Rob Hausam	Hausam Consulting LLC
	Laura Heermann-Langford	Intermountain Healthcare
	Emma Jones	Allscripts
	Russ Leftwich	InterSystems
	Tony Little	Optum 360
	Jay Lyle	Ockham Information Services LLC, VA
	Sarah Maulden	VA
	Hank Mayers	ReliaTech Consulting
	Jim McClay	Univ of Nebraska Medical Center
	Russell McDonell	Telstra Health
	Lloyd McKenzie	Gevity (HL7 Canada)
	Larry McKnight	Cerner
	Michelle M Miller	Cerner
	Lisa Nelson	Life Over Time Solutions
	Viet Nguyen	Lockheed Martin, Systems Made Simple
	M'Lynda Owens	Cognosante
	Craig Parker	Intermountain Healthcare
	Scott Robertson	Kaiser Permanente
	Simon Sum	Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
	Iona Thraen	Dept of Veterans Affairs

Quorum Requirements Met: yes

Agenda Topics

Mon, Sept 12 - FHIR ballot closes
Fri, Sept 16 - FHIR triage complete and ballot content loaded to gForge (or alternate)
Sept 17-23 - Baltimore WGM
Sun, Dec 11
- Reconciliation complete/substantive changes applied
- Just over 10 weeks
- Will re-evaluate at Baltimore based on volume of ballot comments
Dec 31 - Publish

Level 3 requires the artifact has been verified by the work group as meeting the DSTU_2_QA_guidelines and has been subject to a round of formal balloting; has at least 10 implementer comments recorded in the tracker drawn from at least 3 organizations resulting in at least one substantive change

Resource	Current FMM Level	Goal FMM Level	QA Status	QA Reviewer	Implementation	Comments
AllergyIntolerance	1	3		Rob	Argonaut
Condition	2	3		PCWG	Argonaut
Procedure	1	3			Argonaut
CarePlan	1	3			Argonaut
Goal	1	3
QuestionnaireResponse	2	2		Lloyd		Lloyd will QA to get to level 3
Questionnaire	0	2		Lloyd		Lloyd will QA to get to level 3
CareTeam	0	2	NA	NA		Aggressive goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
FamilyMemberHistory	1	2	NA	NA		Aggressive goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
ClinicalImpression	0	1	NA	NA
ReferralRequest	1	1	NA	NA
ProcedureRequest	1	1	NA	NA
Linkage	0	1	NA	NA
Flag	1	1	NA	NA
Communication	1	1	NA	NA
CommunicationRequest	1	1	NA	NA

Note: Bold denotes top 20 resource based on survey
Note: Contraindication and Risk Assessment are owned by CDS, not Patient Care

Adjourned at <hh:mm am/pm> <timezone>.

Actions

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

Agenda review
Approve previous meeting minutes
- Motion: <moved>/<seconded> Abstain - <#>, Negative - <#>, Approve - <#>
gForge change request

@@ Line 163: / Line 163: @@
 [http://hl7-fhir.github.io/resource.html#maturity]
 * Level 3 requires the artifact has been verified by the work group as meeting the [[DSTU_2_QA_guidelines]] and has been subject to a round of formal balloting; has at least 10 implementer comments recorded in the tracker drawn from at least 3 organizations resulting in at least one substantive change
-** Substantive changes (element names, sort order, vocabulary bindings, etc.) need to be applied by ballot freeze (Aug 10).
-** Unapplied QA checklist changes can be logged as ballot issues to be applied Sept-Dec.  Substantive changes after ballot should be driven by ballot.
-** Non-substantive changes are fine
-* Level 2 requires artifact has been tested and successfully exchanged between at least three independently developed systems leveraging at least 80% of the core data elements using semi-realistic data and scenarios based on at least one of the declared scopes of the resource (e.g. at a connectathon). These interoperability results must have been reported to and accepted by the FMG.
 {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"