This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20160713 FMG concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no'''
 
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no'''
 
|-
 
|-
| Co chairs|| ||David Hay || ||Lloyd McKenzie
+
| Co chairs||x ||David Hay || ||Lloyd McKenzie
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ex-officio|| ||Woody Beeler,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO
 
| ex-officio|| ||Woody Beeler,<br/> Dave Shaver <br/>FGB Co-chairs||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO
Line 22: Line 22:
 
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests
 
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests
 
|-
 
|-
| || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite  || ||Paul Knapp || || Anne W., scribe
+
|x || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite  || x||Paul Knapp ||x || Anne W., scribe
 
|-
 
|-
| ||Josh Mandel  || ||John Moehrke|| ||Brian Pech || ||  
+
|x ||Josh Mandel  || ||John Moehrke||x ||Brian Pech || ||  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ||Grahame Grieve  || || || || ||.||<!--guest-->  
 
| ||Grahame Grieve  || || || || ||.||<!--guest-->  
Line 47: Line 47:
 
***David to build spreadsheet
 
***David to build spreadsheet
 
***David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
 
***David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
 +
*Discussion Topics
 +
**Solicitation of feedback on open issues
 
*Reports
 
*Reports
 
**Connectathon management (David/Brian)
 
**Connectathon management (David/Brian)
Line 64: Line 66:
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
+
*Roll Call
 +
*Agenda Check
 +
**MOTION to approve: Hans/Josh
 +
**VOTE: all in favor
 +
*Minutes from [[20160706_FMG_concall]]
 +
**MOTION to approve:  Hans/Josh
 +
**VOTE: all in favor
 +
*Administrative
 +
**Action items
 +
***All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
 +
****Add for next week
 +
***Lloyd to update explanation on how to read the reports spreadsheet and see if he can get the emails to work properly; then send an email to the co-chairs to review/address the stale column
 +
****Add for next week
 +
***David to draft message to co-chairs regarding WG intentions for FMM levels 
 +
****Decision to hold off - remove from actions
 +
***Grahame to write up definition of custom resources for review
 +
****Will review later in call
 +
***Lloyd to reach out to Bryn to add RIM scope to ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition
 +
****Add for next week
 +
**Connectathon Actions
 +
***Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
 +
****Reached out and they were going to make updates. Leave on for next week.
 +
***Brian Post to fill in scenarios on Provider Directories and Scheduling
 +
****Add for next week
 +
***Eric to follow up to see if Vitals Profile track will go ahead
 +
****Add for next week
 +
***David to build spreadsheet
 +
****Complete
 +
***David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
 +
****Does now contain success scenarios - complete.
 +
*Discussion Topics
 +
**Solicitation of feedback on open issues
 +
***Originated from discussion on Zulip FMG stream between Grahame/Lloyd. Do we want to do something like this for STU3? Zulip seems a more appropriate place for this type of feedback. Not sure why there would be a different place than Gforge and Zulip and recommend taking this page down.
 +
****MOTION to discontinue this practice: Paul/Brian Pech
 +
****VOTE: all in favor
 +
*Reports
 +
**Connectathon management (David/Brian)
 +
***No updates.  Do we want to have tables for streams? Paul: Payers want adjacent tables so they can congregate in a herd and communicate more efficiently. David: We would then need more concrete info on what tracks people want to participate in. Brian Pech: Chatter about large numbers coming because of Baltimore location. Do we have a handle on that? David: Has heard similar but nothing concrete yet. Registration is now open. Discussion over how to capture track preference information.
 +
****ACTION: David will contact Mary Ann to discuss details
 +
****ACTION: David will draft email to attendees regarding track preference signup
 +
**[[FHIR Governance Board|FGB]] –
 +
***Cancelled this week
 +
*Adjourned at 4:30 pm Eastern
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 81: Line 125:
 
Back to [[FHIR_Management_Group]]
 
Back to [[FHIR_Management_Group]]
  
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International
+
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International

Latest revision as of 21:17, 13 July 2016

HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/279790597

(voice and screen)

Date: 2016-07-13
Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Chair: Note taker(s): Anne W.
Quorum = chair + 4 yes/no
Co chairs x David Hay Lloyd McKenzie
ex-officio Woody Beeler,
Dave Shaver
FGB Co-chairs
. Wayne Kubick, CTO
Members Members Members Observers/Guests
x Hans Buitendijk Brian Postlethwaite x Paul Knapp x Anne W., scribe
x Josh Mandel John Moehrke x Brian Pech
Grahame Grieve .

Agenda

  • Roll Call
  • Agenda Check
  • Minutes from 20160706_FMG_concall
  • Administrative
    • Action items
      • All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
      • Lloyd to update explanation on how to read the reports spreadsheet and see if he can get the emails to work properly; then send an email to the co-chairs to review/address the stale column
      • David to draft message to co-chairs regarding WG intentions for FMM levels
      • Grahame to write up definition of custom resources for review
      • Lloyd to reach out to Bryn to add RIM scope to ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition
    • Connectathon Actions
      • Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
      • Brian Post to fill in scenarios on Provider Directories and Scheduling
      • Eric to follow up to see if Vitals Profile track will go ahead
      • David to build spreadsheet
      • David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
  • Discussion Topics
    • Solicitation of feedback on open issues
  • Reports
  • Process management
  • AOB (Any Other Business)

Minutes

  • Roll Call
  • Agenda Check
    • MOTION to approve: Hans/Josh
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Minutes from 20160706_FMG_concall
    • MOTION to approve: Hans/Josh
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Administrative
    • Action items
      • All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
        • Add for next week
      • Lloyd to update explanation on how to read the reports spreadsheet and see if he can get the emails to work properly; then send an email to the co-chairs to review/address the stale column
        • Add for next week
      • David to draft message to co-chairs regarding WG intentions for FMM levels
        • Decision to hold off - remove from actions
      • Grahame to write up definition of custom resources for review
        • Will review later in call
      • Lloyd to reach out to Bryn to add RIM scope to ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition
        • Add for next week
    • Connectathon Actions
      • Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
        • Reached out and they were going to make updates. Leave on for next week.
      • Brian Post to fill in scenarios on Provider Directories and Scheduling
        • Add for next week
      • Eric to follow up to see if Vitals Profile track will go ahead
        • Add for next week
      • David to build spreadsheet
        • Complete
      • David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
        • Does now contain success scenarios - complete.
  • Discussion Topics
    • Solicitation of feedback on open issues
      • Originated from discussion on Zulip FMG stream between Grahame/Lloyd. Do we want to do something like this for STU3? Zulip seems a more appropriate place for this type of feedback. Not sure why there would be a different place than Gforge and Zulip and recommend taking this page down.
        • MOTION to discontinue this practice: Paul/Brian Pech
        • VOTE: all in favor
  • Reports
    • Connectathon management (David/Brian)
      • No updates. Do we want to have tables for streams? Paul: Payers want adjacent tables so they can congregate in a herd and communicate more efficiently. David: We would then need more concrete info on what tracks people want to participate in. Brian Pech: Chatter about large numbers coming because of Baltimore location. Do we have a handle on that? David: Has heard similar but nothing concrete yet. Registration is now open. Discussion over how to capture track preference information.
        • ACTION: David will contact Mary Ann to discuss details
        • ACTION: David will draft email to attendees regarding track preference signup
    • FGB
      • Cancelled this week
  • Adjourned at 4:30 pm Eastern

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

20160720 FMG concall


Back to FHIR_Management_Group

© 2016 Health Level Seven® International