Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent June 29, 2016"
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
||||||[mailto: Ken Sinn] | ||||||[mailto: Ken Sinn] | ||
+ | Johnathan coleman, , grahame, ioana, john Moehrke, Kathleen Ken Salyards, Ken Sinn, Mohammad Jafari, Oliver, Patrick Loyd, Rick, Robert Horn, Suzanne | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
# '''Agenda Review, Attendance''' | # '''Agenda Review, Attendance''' | ||
#* Approve [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Consent_June_,_2016 FHIR CD June 17 Meeting Minutes]''' | #* Approve [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Consent_June_,_2016 FHIR CD June 17 Meeting Minutes]''' | ||
− | # | + | # FHIR Consent changes made by Grahame - update |
− | |||
# open issues discussion (see wiki) | # open issues discussion (see wiki) | ||
# Path forward - decision / FHIR ballot; what our path is for the next month. | # Path forward - decision / FHIR ballot; what our path is for the next month. | ||
− | #* information needed for FMG meeting (need approval from FMG) | + | #* information needed for FMG meeting (need approval from FMG) www.hl7.org/index.php?_title=FHIR_Ballot_Prep |
#** profile on contract? | #** profile on contract? | ||
#** consent track? | #** consent track? | ||
− | #** | + | #** consent resource? |
− | # Kathleen has edits that are not in the track yet re tracker capabilities (for next week agenda?) | + | # Kathleen has edits that are not in the track yet re tracker capabilities/tracker needs (for next week agenda?) |
+ | #* updates to | ||
+ | |||
+ | Timeline: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Grahame's changes reviewed - we will answer the question | ||
+ | we will need to verify the resource decision with regard to particular purposes to define/refine the value sets | ||
+ | happy to hear endorsements after the review of the changes made and prioritize John's question) | ||
+ | * removed stuff from base resource policy | ||
+ | ** sections that describe the rules | ||
+ | ** | ||
+ | * in exceptions; principle change made | ||
+ | ** a couple more values | ||
+ | |||
+ | value set of consent, all for the types, resource types | ||
+ | can we add other forms retrievable, obtainable? (K) | ||
+ | (g) this shows how to do lab reports, CDA...we can add other references other reference and IG, you can add your codes if you want. | ||
+ | |||
+ | From Chat: | ||
+ | ''John Moehrke'' | ||
+ | http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?_title=FHIR_Ballot_Prep | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rule Combinations: I think we need to make clear that within an exception all elements are in an AND relationship (this period AND this actor(s) AND this action(s) AND this securityLabel(s) ..), and between exceptions is an OR relationship (exception 1 OR exception 2 OR exception 3 ...), and if no exceptions fire then the root policy is executed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kathleen to write up request to add ''implied consent'' (jurisdictional policy? from OI?OO and jurisdictions, pre-build exception rules) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Grahame needs examples to clarify the discussion on the changes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''discussion on status''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | use of category''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Oliver: two approaches; |
Revision as of 19:40, 29 June 2016
HL7 CBCC FHIR Consent Working Meeting
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Attendees
Member Name | Member Name | Member Name | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | x | Kathleen Connor FM Co-Chair | x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair | ||||
x | Alexander Mense Security Co-Chair | . | Jim Kretz | x | Tarik Idris | |||
x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Pat Pyette | |||
. | M'Lynda Owens | x | David Staggs | x | Glen Marshall | |||
Rob Horn | Beth Pumo | William Kinsley | ||||||
. | Serafina Versaggi | . | [mailto: David Pyke]] | x | Ken Sinn (Canada) | |||
Igor Sirkovich | . | Mike Davis | Mohammad Jafari (VA/ESC) | |||||
Ken Salyards | Adrian Gropper | . | [mailto: Andrew Rampolla (SSA)] | |||||
. | [mailto: Wayne Kubick] | . | [mailto: Beth Pumo] | [mailto: Ken Sinn]
Johnathan coleman, , grahame, ioana, john Moehrke, Kathleen Ken Salyards, Ken Sinn, Mohammad Jafari, Oliver, Patrick Loyd, Rick, Robert Horn, Suzanne |
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Agenda
- Agenda Review, Attendance
- Approve FHIR CD June 17 Meeting Minutes
- FHIR Consent changes made by Grahame - update
- open issues discussion (see wiki)
- Path forward - decision / FHIR ballot; what our path is for the next month.
- information needed for FMG meeting (need approval from FMG) www.hl7.org/index.php?_title=FHIR_Ballot_Prep
- profile on contract?
- consent track?
- consent resource?
- information needed for FMG meeting (need approval from FMG) www.hl7.org/index.php?_title=FHIR_Ballot_Prep
- Kathleen has edits that are not in the track yet re tracker capabilities/tracker needs (for next week agenda?)
- updates to
Timeline:
Grahame's changes reviewed - we will answer the question we will need to verify the resource decision with regard to particular purposes to define/refine the value sets happy to hear endorsements after the review of the changes made and prioritize John's question)
- removed stuff from base resource policy
- sections that describe the rules
- in exceptions; principle change made
- a couple more values
value set of consent, all for the types, resource types can we add other forms retrievable, obtainable? (K) (g) this shows how to do lab reports, CDA...we can add other references other reference and IG, you can add your codes if you want.
From Chat: John Moehrke http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?_title=FHIR_Ballot_Prep
Rule Combinations: I think we need to make clear that within an exception all elements are in an AND relationship (this period AND this actor(s) AND this action(s) AND this securityLabel(s) ..), and between exceptions is an OR relationship (exception 1 OR exception 2 OR exception 3 ...), and if no exceptions fire then the root policy is executed.
Kathleen to write up request to add implied consent (jurisdictional policy? from OI?OO and jurisdictions, pre-build exception rules)
Grahame needs examples to clarify the discussion on the changes.
discussion on status
use of category
Oliver: two approaches;