This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 22 June 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|- | |- | ||
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | <!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | ||
− | | | + | | y || Jay Lyle |
|colspan="2"| JP Systems | |colspan="2"| JP Systems | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Richard Esmond |
|colspan="2"| PenRad | |colspan="2"| PenRad | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Rob Hausam |
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|colspan="2"| NLM | |colspan="2"| NLM | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Viet Nguyen |
+ | |colspan="2"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | y || Floyd Eisenberg | ||
+ | |colspan="2"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | y || Susan Barber | ||
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 107: | Line 113: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | # | + | # PSS status: MnM approves; Jay to return to DESD |
+ | # CQF update | ||
+ | ## Need to allow "not done reason" on procedures that end up getting done anyway | ||
+ | ## Design proposals to represent procedures not done either | ||
+ | ### require queries to filter negated records, or | ||
+ | ### cause combinatorial explosion by defining classes for every negated situation | ||
+ | ## Solution pending: see [https://github.com/esacinc/cql-formatting-and-usage-wiki/wiki/negation-in-qdm github page] | ||
+ | # Case list completeness (see spreadsheet: Use Cases) | ||
+ | ## Group requested to review use case list, ensure it's complete & correctly classified | ||
+ | # Completeness tactics | ||
+ | ## In process | ||
+ | # Semantics | ||
+ | ## Observable or finding: can we articulate an operational criterion for when to use which and why? | ||
+ | ### No spleen vs no rash: is the "normal vs abnormal" axis relevant? | ||
+ | ### What's abnormal may be normal for a context -- rash may be a common question for a viral infection exam | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== |
Latest revision as of 18:36, 23 June 2016
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2016-06-22 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Richard Esmond | PenRad | |
Gerard Freriks | |||
y | Rob Hausam | ||
Serafina Versaggi | |||
Cynthia Barton | NLM | ||
y | Viet Nguyen | ||
y | Floyd Eisenberg | ||
y | Susan Barber | ||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- . PSS status
- . Case list completeness (see spreadsheet: Use Cases)
- . Completeness tactics
- FHIM
- Work groups
- Ontology guru outreach
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- PSS status: MnM approves; Jay to return to DESD
- CQF update
- Need to allow "not done reason" on procedures that end up getting done anyway
- Design proposals to represent procedures not done either
- require queries to filter negated records, or
- cause combinatorial explosion by defining classes for every negated situation
- Solution pending: see github page
- Case list completeness (see spreadsheet: Use Cases)
- Group requested to review use case list, ensure it's complete & correctly classified
- Completeness tactics
- In process
- Semantics
- Observable or finding: can we articulate an operational criterion for when to use which and why?
- No spleen vs no rash: is the "normal vs abnormal" axis relevant?
- What's abnormal may be normal for a context -- rash may be a common question for a viral infection exam
- Observable or finding: can we articulate an operational criterion for when to use which and why?
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.