Difference between revisions of "June 07, 2016 CBCC Conference Call"
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| x || [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman]CBCC Co-Chair | || x || [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman]CBCC Co-Chair | ||
− | |||||| [mailto:suzanne.webb@engilitycorp.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb ] CBCC Co-Chair | + | ||| x ||| [mailto:suzanne.webb@engilitycorp.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb ] CBCC Co-Chair |
||| x ||| [mailto:jim.kretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz] CBCC Co-Chair | ||| x ||| [mailto:jim.kretz@samhsa.hhs.gov Jim Kretz] CBCC Co-Chair | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .|| [mailto:Max.Walker@health.vic.gov.au Max Walker] | || .|| [mailto:Max.Walker@health.vic.gov.au Max Walker] | ||
− | |||||| [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] | + | ||| x ||| [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] |
||| x ||| [mailto:johnmoehrke@gmail.com John Moehrke] Security Co-Chair | ||| x ||| [mailto:johnmoehrke@gmail.com John Moehrke] Security Co-Chair | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | || x || [mailto:serafina.versaggi@gmail.com Serafina Versaggi] |
|||||| [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] | |||||| [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] | ||
||| x ||| [mailto:gfm@securityrs.com Glen Marshall] | ||| x ||| [mailto:gfm@securityrs.com Glen Marshall] | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | || || [mailto:Beth.Pumo@kp.org Beth Pumo] | + | || x || [mailto:Beth.Pumo@kp.org Beth Pumo] |
|||||| [mailto:mlynda.owens@cognizant.com M'Lynda Owens] | |||||| [mailto:mlynda.owens@cognizant.com M'Lynda Owens] | ||
− | |||||| [mailto:lwise@summitmedicalcentercasper.com Lee Wise] | + | ||| x ||| [mailto:lwise@summitmedicalcentercasper.com Lee Wise] |
|- | |- | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
Approve: 9; Object: 0; Abstain: 2 | Approve: 9; Object: 0; Abstain: 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''CDA R2 Implementation Guide: Privacy Consent Directives R1 (PID 553)''' Publication update | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Neelima: Changes being made to document; will move forward with publication once complete | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Behavioral Health Data Exchange CrossParadigm IG: Project 800)''' Update | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Ioana uploaded the PSS change approved by CBCC to our GForge page under "Releases" for our planned September ballot: [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/cbcc/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=186 Behavioral_Health_Data_Exchange_CrossParadigm_IG_Project_800] | ||
+ | * Ioana will follow up with the co-chairs from the intended co-sponsors and the US Realm Task force and CC the co-chairs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Standards Privacy Impact Assessment (SPIA) Cookbook''' Update | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Rick: CBCC approved the PSS a few weeks ago (verify this in the mtg minutes). Security as co-sponsor also approved the PSS. | ||
+ | * The PSS advanced to the DESD, which approved it during the WGM in Montreal. | ||
+ | * Rick then sent the PSS to the TSC. He attended the TSC meeting yesterday. TSC members were concerned that some of the language in the Scope sounded as if the project intended to impose a new requirement on HL7. They wanted clarity on whether it would really impose a new requirement or if it was just intended to be a guide for standards developers to follow when writing standards and adding a Privacy Considerations section to their standard. | ||
+ | * Rick clarified that it is indeed intended to be a guide. TSC asked him to edit the PSS accordingly. | ||
+ | * Rick edited the PSS and showed the changes to today's CBCC attendees. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''MOTION''': Approve the new PSS as revised. (Suzanne/Glen) | ||
+ | ''Approve: 11; Object: 0; Abstain: 0'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PASS Audit Service Conceptual Model''' Update | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Mike: The conceptual models have been developed. We show a high-level model of the Audit Service itself. Proposed to show the model to CBCC on next week's call. | ||
+ | * Johnathan: That would be great. Does that encompass the PASS Access Control Conceptual Model as well or did you create each one separately? | ||
+ | * Mike: Separately. There is another PASS Access Control standard that's been balloted. It has its own model for access control. The audit one is a separate model purely for audit. | ||
+ | * Audit pulls information from Access Control related to Identity and Authentication Services, but the services and capabilities in the model are specific to audit. | ||
+ | * Johnathan: When Diana is back, we can take a look at the Audit Conceptual Model next week. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''FHIR Consent''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Johnathan: We had a call last Friday. Due to scheduling conflicts and other activities, we will not be having a call this Friday. | ||
+ | * As discussed on the FHIR Consent call last Friday, FMG is going to discuss the way forward for FHIR Consent during its meeting tomorrow (not exactly sure if it's tomorrow). FMG is going to discuss the various options that have been presented regarding Profile on Contract versus Resources versus the Consent Tracker. We look forward to receiving their feedback so that we can continue to move the project forward within the timeline. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Meeting adjourned at 1425 EDT'' --[[User:Rgrow|Rgrow]] ([[User talk:Rgrow|talk]]) 11:08, 14 June 2016 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:09, 14 June 2016
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | x | Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair | |||
. | Max Walker | x | Mike Davis | x | John Moehrke Security Co-Chair | |||
Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair | Ken Salyards | Lori Simon | ||||||
Diana Proud-Madruga SOA Co-Chair | x | Rick Grow | . | Harry Rhodes | ||||
x | Serafina Versaggi | Ioana Singureanu | x | Glen Marshall | ||||
. | Steve Eichner | x | Neelima Chennamaraja | . | Mike Lardiere | |||
x | Beth Pumo | M'Lynda Owens | x | Lee Wise | ||||
Paul Knapp | . | Matt Peeling | Brian Newton | |||||
Oliver Lawless | Lisa Nelson | . | Amanda Nash | |||||
Russell McDonell | Susan Litton | David Bergman | ||||||
. | Linda Bailey-Woods | Debbie Bucci | Paul Knapp | |||||
Keith Boone | Lori McNeil Tolley | Duane DeCouteau | ||||||
Mohammed Jafari | Rob Horn | Gary Dickinson | ||||||
William Kinsley | David Pyke | Ken Sinn |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Meeting Minutes from May 31, 2016 CBCC Conference Call
- (05 min) Approval of WGM Meeting Minutes
- (05 min) CDA R2 Implementation Guide: Privacy Consent Directives R1 (PID 553) Publication update
- (05 min) Behavioral Health Data Exchange CrossParadigm IG: Project 800) update - Ioana
- (10 min) Standards Privacy Impact Assessment (SPIA) Cookbook - Rick
- After reviewing PSS, the TSC requested edits to reflect that project is indeed a guide and does not intend to impose a new requirement on HL7.
- Edited PSS to be shown to CBCC WG and vote requested to approve the edits.
6. (05 min) Pass Audit Service Conceptual Model - Diana
7. (05 min) PASS Access Control Services Conceptual Model - (Standing agenda item) update (Diana)
8. (10 min) FHIR Consent - Johnathan
Meeting Minutes (DRAFT)
Meeting chaired by Johnathan
Roll Call, Approve Agenda, Approve Meeting Minutes from May 31, 2016 CBCC Conference Call
Approve: 9; Object: 0; Abstain: 2
CDA R2 Implementation Guide: Privacy Consent Directives R1 (PID 553) Publication update
- Neelima: Changes being made to document; will move forward with publication once complete
Behavioral Health Data Exchange CrossParadigm IG: Project 800) Update
- Ioana uploaded the PSS change approved by CBCC to our GForge page under "Releases" for our planned September ballot: Behavioral_Health_Data_Exchange_CrossParadigm_IG_Project_800
- Ioana will follow up with the co-chairs from the intended co-sponsors and the US Realm Task force and CC the co-chairs.
Standards Privacy Impact Assessment (SPIA) Cookbook Update
- Rick: CBCC approved the PSS a few weeks ago (verify this in the mtg minutes). Security as co-sponsor also approved the PSS.
- The PSS advanced to the DESD, which approved it during the WGM in Montreal.
- Rick then sent the PSS to the TSC. He attended the TSC meeting yesterday. TSC members were concerned that some of the language in the Scope sounded as if the project intended to impose a new requirement on HL7. They wanted clarity on whether it would really impose a new requirement or if it was just intended to be a guide for standards developers to follow when writing standards and adding a Privacy Considerations section to their standard.
- Rick clarified that it is indeed intended to be a guide. TSC asked him to edit the PSS accordingly.
- Rick edited the PSS and showed the changes to today's CBCC attendees.
MOTION: Approve the new PSS as revised. (Suzanne/Glen) Approve: 11; Object: 0; Abstain: 0
PASS Audit Service Conceptual Model Update
- Mike: The conceptual models have been developed. We show a high-level model of the Audit Service itself. Proposed to show the model to CBCC on next week's call.
- Johnathan: That would be great. Does that encompass the PASS Access Control Conceptual Model as well or did you create each one separately?
- Mike: Separately. There is another PASS Access Control standard that's been balloted. It has its own model for access control. The audit one is a separate model purely for audit.
- Audit pulls information from Access Control related to Identity and Authentication Services, but the services and capabilities in the model are specific to audit.
- Johnathan: When Diana is back, we can take a look at the Audit Conceptual Model next week.
FHIR Consent
- Johnathan: We had a call last Friday. Due to scheduling conflicts and other activities, we will not be having a call this Friday.
- As discussed on the FHIR Consent call last Friday, FMG is going to discuss the way forward for FHIR Consent during its meeting tomorrow (not exactly sure if it's tomorrow). FMG is going to discuss the various options that have been presented regarding Profile on Contract versus Resources versus the Consent Tracker. We look forward to receiving their feedback so that we can continue to move the project forward within the timeline.
Meeting adjourned at 1425 EDT --Rgrow (talk) 11:08, 14 June 2016 (EDT)