This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Patient Care FHIR Call Template"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 142: Line 142:
  
 
==Supporting Information==
 
==Supporting Information==
−
'''FHIR Resources owned by Patient Care'''<br/>
+
'''STU 3 Timeline'''
−
Maturity levels [http://hl7-fhir.github.io/resource.html#maturity]
+
* Wed, June 1
 +
** All resource and IG proposals for STU3 have been completed, reviewed by WG and submitted
 +
**  Connectathon tracks for Sept have been proposed
 +
**  Feedback on gForge submitted to FMG
 +
* Sun, July 17 - Substantive content freeze for ballot -- core resources
 +
* Sun, July 24 - Total content freeze, start of QA
 +
* Wed, Aug 10 (midnight) - All QA changes applied
 +
* Fri, Aug 12 - FHIR ballot opens
 +
* Fri, Sept 12 - FHIR ballot closes
 +
* Fri, Sept 16 - FHIR triage complete and ballot content loaded to gForge (or alternate)
 +
* Sept 17-23 - Baltimore WGM
 +
* Sun, Dec 11
 +
**  Reconciliation complete/substantive changes applied
 +
**  Just over 10 weeks
 +
**  Will re-evaluate at Baltimore based on volume of ballot comments
 +
* Dec 31 - Publish
  
−
* Questionnaire (2) -- Lloyd will QA to get to 3
+
'''FHIR Maturity Levels'''
−
* Questionnaire Response (2) -- Lloyd will QA to get to 3
+
[http://hl7-fhir.github.io/resource.html#maturity]
−
* Condition (2)  
+
* Level 3 requires the artifact has been verified by the work group as meeting the [[DSTU_2_QA_guidelines]] and has been subject to a round of formal balloting; has at least 10 implementer comments recorded in the tracker drawn from at least 3 organizations resulting in at least one substantive change
−
* AllergyIntolerance (1) -- Rob
+
** Substantive changes (element names, sort order, vocabulary bindings, etc.) need to be applied by ballot freeze (Aug 10). 
−
* Procedure (1)
+
** Unapplied QA checklist changes can be logged as ballot issues to be applied Sept-Dec.  Substantive changes after ballot should be driven by ballot. 
−
Connectathon candidates
+
** Non-substantive changes are fine
−
* CarePlan (1)
+
* Level 2 requires artifact has been tested and successfully exchanged between at least three independently developed systems leveraging at least 80% of the core data elements using semi-realistic data and scenarios based on at least one of the declared scopes of the resource (e.g. at a connectathon). These interoperability results must have been reported to and accepted by the FMG.
−
* Goal (1)
+
 
−
* Referral Request (1)
+
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
−
* FamilyMemberHistory (1)  
+
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Resource''' <br/>
−
Lower priority resources
+
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Current FMM Level'''
−
* Procedure Request (1)
+
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Goal FMM Level'''
−
* Flag (1)
+
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QA Status'''
−
* ClinicalImpression (0) -- goal to move to level 1 by next release
+
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QA Reviewer'''
−
* Communication (1)
+
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Implementation'''
−
* CommunicationRequest (1)
+
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Comments'''<br/>
−
<br>
+
|-
 +
|| '''AllergyIntolerance''' || 1 || 3 || || Rob || Argonaut ||
 +
|-
 +
|| '''Condition''' || 2 || 3 || || || Argonaut ||
 +
|-
 +
|| '''Procedure''' || 1 || 3 || || || Argonaut || 
 +
|-
 +
|| '''CarePlan''' || 1 || 3 || || || Argonaut ||
 +
|-
 +
|| Goal || 1 || 3 || || || ||
 +
|-
 +
|| QuestionnaireResponse || 2 || 2 || || Lloyd || || Lloyd will QA to get to level 3  
 +
|-
 +
|| Questionnaire || 0 || 2 || || Lloyd || || Lloyd will QA to get to level 3
 +
|-
 +
|| CareTeam || 0 || 2 || NA || NA || || Questionnaire goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
 +
|-
 +
|| FamilyMemberHistory || 1 || 2 || NA || NA || || Questionnable goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
 +
|-
 +
|| ClinicalImpression || 0 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|| ReferralRequest || 1 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|| ProcedureRequest || 1 || 1 || NA || NA || ||  
 +
|-
 +
|| Linkage || 0 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|| Flag || 1 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|| Communication || 1 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|| CommunicationRequest || 1 || 1 || NA || NA || || 
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
Note:  Bold denotes top 20 resource based on [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/12GVflt2GLprr8E3_8dppkxBZXqTg2n_zdaWzo6qtags/viewanalytics| survey ] <br>
 
Note:  Contraindication and Risk Assessment are owned by CDS, not Patient Care <br/>
 
Note:  Contraindication and Risk Assessment are owned by CDS, not Patient Care <br/>
  

Revision as of 12:43, 10 May 2016



Meeting Information

Patient Care FHIR Resources Conference Call

Location: Conference Call
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270
Participant Passcode: 943377
Live Meeting: https://www147.livemeeting.com/cc/_XML/cerner/join?id=8FNF2S&role=attend&pw=m9Kd%7Cx9

Date: 2016-MM-DD
Time: 5-6:30pm ET
Facilitator Michelle M Miller Note taker(s) Michelle M Miller
Attendee Name Affiliation


Elaine Ayres NIH/Department of Clinical Research Informatics
Stephen Chu
Eric Haas Haas Consulting
Rob Hausam Hausam Consulting LLC
Laura Heermann-Langford Intermountain Healthcare
Emma Jones Allscripts
Russ Leftwich InterSystems
Jay Lyle Ockham Information Services LLC, VA
Sarah Maulden VA
Jim McClay Univ of Nebraska Medical Center
Russell McDonell Telstra Health
Lloyd McKenzie Gevity (HL7 Canada)
Larry McKnight Cerner
Michelle M Miller Cerner
Lisa Nelson Life Over Time Solutions
Viet Nguyen Systems Made Simple
M'Lynda Owens Cognosante
Craig Parker Intermountain Healthcare
Scott Robertson Kaiser Permanente
Simon Sum Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Iona Thraen Dept of Veterans Affairs
Quorum Requirements Met: yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. Approve previous meeting minutes
    • Motion: <moved>/<seconded> Abstain - <#>, Negative - <#>, Approve - <#>
  3. Prior Action Item Follow-up
  4. gForge change request

Supporting Information

STU 3 Timeline

  • Wed, June 1
    • All resource and IG proposals for STU3 have been completed, reviewed by WG and submitted
    • Connectathon tracks for Sept have been proposed
    • Feedback on gForge submitted to FMG
  • Sun, July 17 - Substantive content freeze for ballot -- core resources
  • Sun, July 24 - Total content freeze, start of QA
  • Wed, Aug 10 (midnight) - All QA changes applied
  • Fri, Aug 12 - FHIR ballot opens
  • Fri, Sept 12 - FHIR ballot closes
  • Fri, Sept 16 - FHIR triage complete and ballot content loaded to gForge (or alternate)
  • Sept 17-23 - Baltimore WGM
  • Sun, Dec 11
    • Reconciliation complete/substantive changes applied
    • Just over 10 weeks
    • Will re-evaluate at Baltimore based on volume of ballot comments
  • Dec 31 - Publish

FHIR Maturity Levels [1]

  • Level 3 requires the artifact has been verified by the work group as meeting the DSTU_2_QA_guidelines and has been subject to a round of formal balloting; has at least 10 implementer comments recorded in the tracker drawn from at least 3 organizations resulting in at least one substantive change
    • Substantive changes (element names, sort order, vocabulary bindings, etc.) need to be applied by ballot freeze (Aug 10).
    • Unapplied QA checklist changes can be logged as ballot issues to be applied Sept-Dec. Substantive changes after ballot should be driven by ballot.
    • Non-substantive changes are fine
  • Level 2 requires artifact has been tested and successfully exchanged between at least three independently developed systems leveraging at least 80% of the core data elements using semi-realistic data and scenarios based on at least one of the declared scopes of the resource (e.g. at a connectathon). These interoperability results must have been reported to and accepted by the FMG.
Resource
Current FMM Level Goal FMM Level QA Status QA Reviewer Implementation Comments
AllergyIntolerance 1 3 Rob Argonaut
Condition 2 3 Argonaut
Procedure 1 3 Argonaut
CarePlan 1 3 Argonaut
Goal 1 3
QuestionnaireResponse 2 2 Lloyd Lloyd will QA to get to level 3
Questionnaire 0 2 Lloyd Lloyd will QA to get to level 3
CareTeam 0 2 NA NA Questionnaire goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
FamilyMemberHistory 1 2 NA NA Questionnable goal (e.g. whether we'll get the implementations needed)
ClinicalImpression 0 1 NA NA
ReferralRequest 1 1 NA NA
ProcedureRequest 1 1 NA NA
Linkage 0 1 NA NA
Flag 1 1 NA NA
Communication 1 1 NA NA
CommunicationRequest 1 1 NA NA

Note: Bold denotes top 20 resource based on survey
Note: Contraindication and Risk Assessment are owned by CDS, not Patient Care

Minutes

Prior Action Item Follow-up

gForge Change Requests

Adjourn

Adjourned at <hh:mm am/pm> <timezone>.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  1. Agenda review
  2. Approve previous meeting minutes
    • Motion: <moved>/<seconded> Abstain - <#>, Negative - <#>, Approve - <#>
  3. gForge change request

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Patient_Care_FHIR_Call_Template&oldid=119775"