This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent March 18, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
||||.||[mailto: | ||||.||[mailto: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
| + | [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Consent_Directive_Project FHIR Consent Directive Project WiKi] | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
# ''(05 minutes)'' '''Review evolving document''' | # ''(05 minutes)'' '''Review evolving document''' | ||
# ''(05 minutes)'' '''Discuss change proposal''' | # ''(05 minutes)'' '''Discuss change proposal''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Review ''Abstract Data Model'' (written by David) | Review ''Abstract Data Model'' (written by David) | ||
| − | * David not on call to | + | * David not on call to review |
| − | ''' | + | '''Item approved by Financial Management''' Issue |
| − | * Need to revisit | + | * Need to revisit (clarification needed?, Example needed?) |
** The topic is ''City of Milwaukee, consent directive'' | ** The topic is ''City of Milwaukee, consent directive'' | ||
** The subject is the ''patient'' or context situation ''child to be adopted'' ''third party'' interest that is being bargained over | ** The subject is the ''patient'' or context situation ''child to be adopted'' ''third party'' interest that is being bargained over | ||
| Line 56: | Line 54: | ||
This allows you to narrow to narrow the bounds of the consent directive | This allows you to narrow to narrow the bounds of the consent directive | ||
| − | Topic is | + | Topic is 0…* |
| − | '''CP - Change the name from subject to topic''' | + | '''CP - Change the name from ''subject'' to ''topic'' ''' |
| + | Discussion | ||
* The subject: the entity impacted by the contract of intrest to the parties to the contract | * The subject: the entity impacted by the contract of intrest to the parties to the contract | ||
* The topic: who and/or what this contract is about. The matter of consideration abot which an agreement is made which includes an offer or promise of future actions that is accepted | * The topic: who and/or what this contract is about. The matter of consideration abot which an agreement is made which includes an offer or promise of future actions that is accepted | ||
* '''Contract.subject.Defintion''': The entity impacted by the contract or of interest to the parties to the contract. | * '''Contract.subject.Defintion''': The entity impacted by the contract or of interest to the parties to the contract. | ||
| − | We can further clarify | + | We can further clarify the definition, without changing the words. Our clarifications have to fit in the wording found in contract. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Using the word ''context?'' we need a word that will be clear to everyone. ''Context'' is subject of the contract. | |
| − | + | Patient identifier the other holds the list of data objects (two buckets) per John. The resource types are cues, if you want to say that this code is all ''medication resources'' the resource type ''medication'' is a value set. | |
| − | '''Motion: | + | '''Motion: (Kathleen/Serafina) We (the group) will come up with definitions to be pre-applied (meaning--we can update in the future if needed). Topic is the subject of this contract with the caveat of we will revisit the names for clarification. ''' |
| − | |||
The definition of what is currently named ''topic''… the ''context of the contract'' (Serafina / Glen) | The definition of what is currently named ''topic''… the ''context of the contract'' (Serafina / Glen) | ||
1 abstentions, no objections motion carries with 12 | 1 abstentions, no objections motion carries with 12 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discussion: Context is going to point to a set of resource or resource types. | ||
| + | Recommend that instead of finding the perfect word not found anywhere else, we should expand on the definition and clarify (with examples) the current word. In other words -- '' ''' Craft a Better definition. '' ''' | ||
| − | + | Stating that the definitions will be ''Pre-applied'', allows us not to have to completely remove everything if we change the word | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Pre-applied, | ||
Meeting adjourned at 1300 AZT | Meeting adjourned at 1300 AZT | ||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 22 March 2016
HL7 CBCC FHIR Consent Working Meeting
Attendees
| Member Name | Member Name | Member Name | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | x | Kathleen Connor FM Co-Chair | x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair | |||
| x | Alexander Mense Security Co-Chair | . | Marty Prahl | x | Tarik Idris | |||
| x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Pat Pyette | |||
| x | M'Lynda Owens | x | David Staggs | x | Glen Marshall | |||
| . | Rob Horn | . | Beth Pumo | x | William Kinsley | |||
| x | Serafina Versaggi | . | Russell McDonell | x | Ken Sinn (Canada) | |||
| x | Igor Sirkovich | x | [mailto: Andrew Rampolla (SSA)] | . | [mailto: |
FHIR Consent Directive Project WiKi
Agenda
- (05 minutes) Agenda Review, Attendance, Approve Meeting Minutes
- (05 minutes) Review evolving document
- (05 minutes) Discuss change proposal
Review Abstract Data Model (written by David)
- David not on call to review
Item approved by Financial Management Issue
- Need to revisit (clarification needed?, Example needed?)
- The topic is City of Milwaukee, consent directive
- The subject is the patient or context situation child to be adopted third party interest that is being bargained over
This allows you to narrow to narrow the bounds of the consent directive
Topic is 0…*
CP - Change the name from subject to topic Discussion
- The subject: the entity impacted by the contract of intrest to the parties to the contract
- The topic: who and/or what this contract is about. The matter of consideration abot which an agreement is made which includes an offer or promise of future actions that is accepted
- Contract.subject.Defintion: The entity impacted by the contract or of interest to the parties to the contract.
We can further clarify the definition, without changing the words. Our clarifications have to fit in the wording found in contract.
Using the word context? we need a word that will be clear to everyone. Context is subject of the contract.
Patient identifier the other holds the list of data objects (two buckets) per John. The resource types are cues, if you want to say that this code is all medication resources the resource type medication is a value set.
Motion: (Kathleen/Serafina) We (the group) will come up with definitions to be pre-applied (meaning--we can update in the future if needed). Topic is the subject of this contract with the caveat of we will revisit the names for clarification.
The definition of what is currently named topic… the context of the contract (Serafina / Glen) 1 abstentions, no objections motion carries with 12
Discussion: Context is going to point to a set of resource or resource types. Recommend that instead of finding the perfect word not found anywhere else, we should expand on the definition and clarify (with examples) the current word. In other words -- Craft a Better definition.
Stating that the definitions will be Pre-applied, allows us not to have to completely remove everything if we change the word
Meeting adjourned at 1300 AZT
