Difference between revisions of "Clarification on comments re GeneIdentifier.identifier"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Return to [[BRIDG]] | Return to [[BRIDG]] | ||
− | ===Need clarification on comments re GeneIdentifier.identifier (row 26)=== | + | ===CLOSED - Need clarification on comments re GeneIdentifier.identifier (row 26)=== |
====Current Definitions==== | ====Current Definitions==== |
Latest revision as of 03:40, 26 February 2016
Return to BRIDG
CLOSED - Need clarification on comments re GeneIdentifier.identifier (row 26)
Current Definitions
GeneIdentifier
DESCRIPTION: The unique identification of a gene in a specified context.
EXAMPLE(S): Ensembl Database Identifier for human BRCA1 gene; ENSG00000012048
OTHER NAME(S):
NOTE(S):
GeneIdentifier.identifier (inherited by Exon which is a subclass of NucleicAcidSequenceFeature)
DEFINITION: A unique symbol that establishes the identity of the gene.
EXAMPLE(S): The identifier from the Ensembl, EntrezGene, or GenBank database
OTHER NAME(S):
NOTE(S):
Ballot Comment
need specific examples not description
Current Disposition
Pending Input From Submitter
Proposed Disposition Comment
Need specific examples that are considered representative - can an SME provide or should we pull from the class level example?
Outstanding Question
- What is a valid, representative value for GeneIdentifier.identifier?
Responses
Lauren Becnel: Symbols, names and identifiers are usually thought of as two separate things. In the existing example, ENSG00000012048 is the identifier from Ensembl. That is fairly unique, but see below for IDs that are not unique if not combined with the organization that issued them. For the 14-3-3 eta gene (protein described above), here are some idenifiers by organization: ENSG00000128245 from Ensembl, 12853 from HGNC, 00215 from HPRD, 7533 fromNCBI
UPDATE DONE IN THE MODEL
Return to BRIDG