This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Proposal 926: Encounter Query"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Encounter Query Discussion | Encounter Query Discussion | ||
| − | At the WGM it stated that the fulfiller could reject the query, for example, when the requester was not authorized to see the data. This would be a different interaction than the query response. Need to define an additional interaction. | + | At the WGM it stated that the fulfiller could reject the query, for example, when the requester was not authorized to see the data. This would be a different interaction than the query response. Need to define an additional interaction. [Gregg] |
| − | Here is a draft Encounter RMIM for discussion | + | I see that Proposal 884 now includes an interaction to reject the query so I must be confused. Anyway, is there a use case for adding this interaction to this proposal? [Gregg] |
| + | |||
| + | Here is a draft Encounter RMIM for discussion. It probably still has associations and attributes that are not relevant. [Gregg] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:PRPA_RM400001.GIF]] | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 26 January 2007
Encounter Query Discussion
At the WGM it stated that the fulfiller could reject the query, for example, when the requester was not authorized to see the data. This would be a different interaction than the query response. Need to define an additional interaction. [Gregg]
I see that Proposal 884 now includes an interaction to reject the query so I must be confused. Anyway, is there a use case for adding this interaction to this proposal? [Gregg]
Here is a draft Encounter RMIM for discussion. It probably still has associations and attributes that are not relevant. [Gregg]
