This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Representing Negation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StephenChu (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
= Examples/Use Cases= | = Examples/Use Cases= | ||
| − | + | ==EMS== | |
| − | + | A few years ago, the EMS Patient Care Report faced this issue. Finding the discussion nowhere near completion, we adopted the following approach: | |
| + | * Answering a question about a collection of things that might not exist (e.g., allergies) results in answers of two different kinds: lists of things (e.g,. allergies) and statements about whether there are any allergies. We found the RIM semantics provided one way to address these needs, but they did so in a way that is abstract and prone to misprision. | ||
| + | * In order to make the semantics clear and unambiguous, we adopted the pattern of distinguishing two separate questions. In the case of EMS drug allergies, | ||
| + | ** The Boolean 67794-8 Does the patient have any medication allergies NEMSIS (yes, no, unknown), and, if yes, | ||
| + | ** The collection of RxNorm values 67850-8 Medication allergies - RxNorm code NEMSIS | ||
| + | * We also suggested implementers follow the CDA/RIM guidance for using negation indicators on nugatory allergy classes instantiated for the purpose of asserting their absence, in the interest of mutual comprehensibility with any organization the followed that guidance. We would be delighted to learn that this is no longer necessary. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 00:20, 24 October 2015
Return to: Patient Care
Goto: FHIR Clinical Resources - PCWG
Goto: Clinicians on FHIR
Background
There are a number of clinical concepts (and hence clinical FHIR resources) to which negation are commonly applied. Examples include
- Allergy/Intolerance
- Observation
- Condition
- Procedure
- Medication
There does not appear to be a consistent way in applying negation to these (and other similar) resources.
PCWG, FHIR and OO agree that a consistent approach to this matter is highly desirable to ensure interoperability. These groups agree to collaborate in order to determine an agreed approach to achieve this goal.
Contributors
- Stephen Chu
- Russ Leftwich
- Rob Hausam
- Elaine Ayres
- Laura Heermann Langford
- Craig Parker
- Emma Jones
- Michelle Miller
- Lloyd McKenzie
- ...
Definitions
Scope
Examples/Use Cases
EMS
A few years ago, the EMS Patient Care Report faced this issue. Finding the discussion nowhere near completion, we adopted the following approach:
- Answering a question about a collection of things that might not exist (e.g., allergies) results in answers of two different kinds: lists of things (e.g,. allergies) and statements about whether there are any allergies. We found the RIM semantics provided one way to address these needs, but they did so in a way that is abstract and prone to misprision.
- In order to make the semantics clear and unambiguous, we adopted the pattern of distinguishing two separate questions. In the case of EMS drug allergies,
- The Boolean 67794-8 Does the patient have any medication allergies NEMSIS (yes, no, unknown), and, if yes,
- The collection of RxNorm values 67850-8 Medication allergies - RxNorm code NEMSIS
- We also suggested implementers follow the CDA/RIM guidance for using negation indicators on nugatory allergy classes instantiated for the purpose of asserting their absence, in the interest of mutual comprehensibility with any organization the followed that guidance. We would be delighted to learn that this is no longer necessary.
