Difference between revisions of "IEHR"
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) (new page) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There may be new requirements for the Act Reference topic (shared messages domain). | There may be new requirements for the Act Reference topic (shared messages domain). | ||
− | The iEHR project (See [http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/HowWeWork/sgIEHR.aspx | + | The iEHR project (See [http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/HowWeWork/sgIEHR.aspx CIHI project page]) is working on HL7 message based SOA Sig/RLUS functionality. |
We already have 90% of these requirements in the shared message domain. There is some concern that there may be incompatible overlap. But the iEHR folks think that what we have is ok, but there’s a few things new that are needed. The existing material is normative, and there is a proposal for R2 already (published in the September 2006 cycle), so this fits into our plans. | We already have 90% of these requirements in the shared message domain. There is some concern that there may be incompatible overlap. But the iEHR folks think that what we have is ok, but there’s a few things new that are needed. The existing material is normative, and there is a proposal for R2 already (published in the September 2006 cycle), so this fits into our plans. | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Discussion (May2006 WGM): It will be put on the list and we will look for a telecon slot. 15-0-0 | Discussion (May2006 WGM): It will be put on the list and we will look for a telecon slot. 15-0-0 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lloyd (Dec2006): The project will start in January 2007; proposals are likely to be brought forward during the May2007 WGM. |
Latest revision as of 07:08, 19 December 2006
There may be new requirements for the Act Reference topic (shared messages domain).
The iEHR project (See CIHI project page) is working on HL7 message based SOA Sig/RLUS functionality.
We already have 90% of these requirements in the shared message domain. There is some concern that there may be incompatible overlap. But the iEHR folks think that what we have is ok, but there’s a few things new that are needed. The existing material is normative, and there is a proposal for R2 already (published in the September 2006 cycle), so this fits into our plans. iEHR expects to have about 6 new messages.
Motion (May2006 WGM): we are willing to study this and if it’s found to be within our scope then we will accept this proposal as a work item. Rene / Sandy.
Discussion (May2006 WGM): It will be put on the list and we will look for a telecon slot. 15-0-0
Lloyd (Dec2006): The project will start in January 2007; proposals are likely to be brought forward during the May2007 WGM.