C-CDA R2.1 Comment Submission

SDWG completed an update to Consolidated CDA R2.0 to enable a C-CDA 2.1 instance to be created that can be used without requiring change to the product supporting C-CDA 1.1. A full description of the project is available on Project Insight Consolidated CDA DSTU 2013 Update (1014). The C-CDA R2.1 20150701_Review_Posting is available to HL7 members for review prior to reconciliation and publication. As a minor DSTU update, this new version will not go through the usual HL7 balloting process but will use the DSTU Update process with industry review on the HL7 wiki.

Before submitting comments, please review the C-CDA R2.1 Approved Compatibility Principles

Updates open for comment are identified by yellow highlighting.

• Volume 1 - If the heading is highlighted, the entire section is open for comment.
• Volume 2 - The specific conformance statements updated are highlighted. Templates that are only updated to reference a contained template that has been versioned (extension="2015-08-01") are not open for comment. Figures with updated conformance statements are open for review.

3 approaches to find edits: Word advanced find - highlight search, High-level change-log Volume 1 (page 43), Excel comparison files (CDA R1.1 vs 2.0 Reviews) included in the review zip.

During the comment period 7/1/2015 - 7/13/2015, please submit your comments on this wiki page using the table below. A template for adding a row is available at the top of the wiki table when in edit mode. Thank you.

Comments

CONF#	Name	Summary of Issue	Existing Wording	Proposed Wording	Comments
9045	Example Person	Short problem statement	This text is how the issue is currently documented in the IG	This text is the proposal for how the issue could be documented differently in the IG	This is why the issue is important or tells why the proposed wording is beneficial
1198-9045, 1198-32848	Sarah Gaunt	Example needs fixing	Example has the LOINC code in the code and the SNOMED code in the translation	Constraints state this should be the other way round
1198-7504, 1198-10085	Sarah Gaunt	Missing open brackets	SHALL contain 1..1] low (CONF:1198-7504), SHALL contain 1..1] high (CONF:1198-10085)	SHALL contain [1..1] low (CONF:1198-7504), SHALL contain [1..1] high (CONF:1198-10085)	You probably need to escape those brackets like "[[]"