This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Proposal 884: DocumentValidity Verification"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) (initial content, proposal 884) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page documents a proposal (proposal 884) related to the creation of a new topic related to the verification of the validity of an ID document presented by a person. | This page documents a proposal (proposal 884) related to the creation of a new topic related to the verification of the validity of an ID document presented by a person. | ||
*Note that this topic does ''not'' describe the process of verifying if the person (as a biological entity) is the same as the person whose ID is being documented, but about verifying the '''validity of the document''' itself. | *Note that this topic does ''not'' describe the process of verifying if the person (as a biological entity) is the same as the person whose ID is being documented, but about verifying the '''validity of the document''' itself. | ||
− | *The proposal is being brought forward by [[NICTIZ]]. Constrained versions of the models documented in this proposal will be used on a nationwide scale in the context of the Dutch national infrasctucture for the | + | *The proposal is being brought forward by [[NICTIZ]]. Constrained versions of the models documented in this proposal will be used on a nationwide scale in the context of the Dutch national infrasctucture for the exchange of healthcare information ([[AORTA]]). |
− | == | + | However, in the use-case below its the clerk in the hospital that performs the verification, and as part of that process, he queries the official-document-registry. The document-registry does itself not perform any (verification-)activity, it merely returns basic properties associated with an ID. |
+ | |||
+ | ==Storyboard== | ||
+ | '''Purpose''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Diagram''' | ||
[[Image:Dyn_model_doc_verif.gif|500px|center||Interaction Diagram]] | [[Image:Dyn_model_doc_verif.gif|500px|center||Interaction Diagram]] | ||
− | == | + | '''Narrative''' |
+ | |||
+ | ==R-MIM== | ||
===PRPA_RM900101=== | ===PRPA_RM900101=== | ||
+ | '''Diagram''' | ||
[[Image:PRPA_RM900101_act_based.gif|500px|center||Request]] | [[Image:PRPA_RM900101_act_based.gif|500px|center||Request]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===PRPA_RM900102=== | ===PRPA_RM900102=== | ||
+ | '''Diagram''' | ||
[[Image:PRPA_RM900102_act_based.gif|500px|center||Response]] | [[Image:PRPA_RM900102_act_based.gif|500px|center||Response]] | ||
− | === | + | |
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===PRPA_RM900103=== | ||
+ | '''Diagram''' | ||
[[Image:PRPA_RM900103_act_based.gif|200px|center||Reject Request]] | [[Image:PRPA_RM900103_act_based.gif|200px|center||Reject Request]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==Interactions== | ==Interactions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===PRPA_IN900101=== | ||
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01 | ||
+ | *ControlAct Wrapper: | ||
+ | *Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900101 | ||
+ | *Receiver Responsability: | ||
+ | **xxxx, PRPA_IN900102 | ||
+ | **xxxx, PRPA_IN900103 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===PRPA_IN900102=== | ||
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01 | ||
+ | *ControlAct Wrapper: Application Level Acknowledgement, MCCI_MT000300UV01 | ||
+ | *Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900102 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===PRPA_IN900103=== | ||
+ | '''Description''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01 | ||
+ | *ControlAct Wrapper: Application Level Acknowledgement, MCCI_MT000300UV01 | ||
+ | *Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900103 |
Revision as of 14:44, 17 December 2006
This page documents a proposal (proposal 884) related to the creation of a new topic related to the verification of the validity of an ID document presented by a person.
- Note that this topic does not describe the process of verifying if the person (as a biological entity) is the same as the person whose ID is being documented, but about verifying the validity of the document itself.
- The proposal is being brought forward by NICTIZ. Constrained versions of the models documented in this proposal will be used on a nationwide scale in the context of the Dutch national infrasctucture for the exchange of healthcare information (AORTA).
However, in the use-case below its the clerk in the hospital that performs the verification, and as part of that process, he queries the official-document-registry. The document-registry does itself not perform any (verification-)activity, it merely returns basic properties associated with an ID.
Contents
Storyboard
Purpose
Diagram
Narrative
R-MIM
PRPA_RM900101
Diagram
Description
PRPA_RM900102
Diagram
Description
PRPA_RM900103
Diagram
Description
Interactions
PRPA_IN900101
Description
- Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01
- ControlAct Wrapper:
- Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900101
- Receiver Responsability:
- xxxx, PRPA_IN900102
- xxxx, PRPA_IN900103
PRPA_IN900102
Description
- Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01
- ControlAct Wrapper: Application Level Acknowledgement, MCCI_MT000300UV01
- Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900102
PRPA_IN900103
Description
- Transmission Wrapper: Send Message Payload, MCCI_MT000100UV01
- ControlAct Wrapper: Application Level Acknowledgement, MCCI_MT000300UV01
- Message Type: xxx, PRPA_MT900103