Difference between revisions of "C-CDA R2.1 Comment Submission"
Bamarquard (talk | contribs) |
Bamarquard (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
''Enter your comments below this line.'' | ''Enter your comments below this line.'' | ||
| + | <!-- Template fore new rows --> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |<!--CONF #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Full Name #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Summary of issue--> | ||
| + | |<!--Existing wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Proposed wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Comments--> | ||
| + | --> | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:90%; width:99%;" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:90%; width:99%;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | CONF# | ! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | CONF# | ||
! style="font-size:110%; width:140px; background: #B0C4DE" | Name | ! style="font-size:110%; width:140px; background: #B0C4DE" | Name | ||
| − | |||
! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | Summary of Issue | ! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | Summary of Issue | ||
! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | Existing Wording | ! style="font-size:110%; background: #B0C4DE" | Existing Wording | ||
| Line 29: | Line 36: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
|9045 | |9045 | ||
|Example Person | |Example Person | ||
| − | |||
|Short problem statement | |Short problem statement | ||
|This text is how the issue is currently documented in the IG | |This text is how the issue is currently documented in the IG | ||
|This text is the proposal for how the issue could be documented differently in the IG | |This text is the proposal for how the issue could be documented differently in the IG | ||
|This is why the issue is important or tells why the proposed wording is beneficial | |This is why the issue is important or tells why the proposed wording is beneficial | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |<!--CONF #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Full Name #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Summary of issue--> | ||
| + | |<!--Existing wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Proposed wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Comments--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |<!--CONF #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Full Name #--> | ||
| + | |<!--Summary of issue--> | ||
| + | |<!--Existing wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Proposed wording--> | ||
| + | |<!--Comments--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 26 June 2015
SDWG completed an update to Consolidated CDA R2.0 to enable a C-CDA 2.1 instance to be created that can be used without requiring change to the product supporting C-CDA 1.1. A full description of the project is available on Project Insight Consolidated CDA DSTU 2013 Update (1014). This update is available to HL7 members INSERT_LINK_C-CDAR2.1 for review prior to reconciliation and publication. As a minor DSTU update, this new version will not go through the usual HL7 balloting process but will use the DSTU Update process with industry review on the HL7 wiki.
Before submitting comments, please review the C-CDA R2.1 Approved Compatibility Principles
Changes open for comment:
- Volume 1 edits
- Volume 2 edits to prose, figures, and specific conformance statements
Edits available for comment are identified by....
During the comment period 7/1/2015 - 7/13/2015, please submit your comments on this wiki page including at least your name, item, existing wording, proposed wording, and comment. Thank you.
Comments
Enter your comments below this line.
|- | | | | | | -->
| CONF# | Name | Summary of Issue | Existing Wording | Proposed Wording | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9045 | Example Person | Short problem statement | This text is how the issue is currently documented in the IG | This text is the proposal for how the issue could be documented differently in the IG | This is why the issue is important or tells why the proposed wording is beneficial |
|
|
