View source for December 4, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call

=Security Working Group Meeting=

*[[Security| Meeting Information]]
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]

==Attendees==

* [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor]
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair
* [mailto: Reed Gelzer]
* [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair
* [mailto:ajames@drc.com Adrianne James]
* [mailto:paul@palmcourt.com Paul Petronelli]
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida]


[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]

==Agenda==
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=November_27,_2012_Security_Working_Group_Conference_Call  '''Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes'''] & Accept Agenda
#''(05 min)'' Reminder - [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/ballots/2013JAN/downloads/PRIV_SEC_CLASS_SYS_R1_O2_2013JAN.zip '''Healthcare Classification System Draft for Comment ballot'''] now open.  Please [http://www.hl7.org/ctl.cfm?action=ballots.home&ballot_cycle_id=528&ballot_voter_id=7500 sign up] to review.
# Clinical Fact - Kathleen, Mike, Reed
# Priorities through May 2013 ballot cycle
#''(05 min)'' Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Comments - Tony Weida

==Meeting Minutes==
'''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda'''- Meeting minutes from the prior meeting were unavailable and will be reviewed prior to the next scheduled meeting. 

'''Clinical Fact''' - The group is considering possible EHR modifications and how the EHRS will accommodate the clinical labelign for the attributes to EHR standards.

First concept – that every enterprise has a designated set
* Has under its policy and procedures that are subject to any inquiry—internal or external; ''show me this patient’s record''(the big box= designated record set for a given enterprise). Within the designated set is a release of information process, any policy applies to release of information, would be applied with a security tag. A big box, then a sub-set of the big box; what is outside of the records is a plethora of data is an information of record and will likely be important to constrain a record and record set will at least provide two places to look on the functional model side


The group was informed that a program will be launched to develop a project in RMES not as an overarching standard but through profiling.If it is found that the EHR functional model is lacking or needs modification, there is a method in place to create a derivative profile for individual who needs to be updated sooner rather than later. Still in the process of defining the scope of the RMES profile release 2. 

'''Ontology Ballot Reconciliation – Tony Weida'''- Tony continued his review of the ballot reconciliation starting on line 5 of the reconciliation document. Responses to comments on 6, 7, 8 and 9 were approved by the group.

Meeting adjourned at 1516 PST

==Action Items==

Reed Gelzer to take a stab at writing up something for the joint discussion to be held at the HL7 meeting in Phoenix. Something that the EHR folks will understand.

Separate meeting to be scheduled (possibly) for deeper Clinical Fact discussion    

[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]]