Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 19 September 2018"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 114: Line 114:
 
<!-- **** Delete instructions  and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES  ******-->
 
<!-- **** Delete instructions  and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES  ******-->
  
# WGM
+
# Review of [[Media: ProblemStatus.xlsx  | Excel version of status matrix]]
 
+
## Coordination with CDA
* [[Media: ProblemStatus.xlsx  | Excel version of diagram]]
+
### Lisa is working with Jean Duteau
 +
### Can we represent the CDA status matrix as well?
 +
#### Yes, but do this first.
 +
## do we need to scope matrix to one version of FHIR?
 +
## Do we need workflow perspective to understand how these resources are generated?
 +
### That might be prohibitively expensive: 5 status * 6 status = 30 cases, but including transitions would mean ~30^2.
 +
## Inactive hierarchy
 +
### Does inactive mean not currently symptomatic but possibly of concern (viz., remission) or no longer present (viz., resolved)?
 +
### Seems to be a confusion resulting from the fact that this property tries to support two requirements: "Is it symptomatic?" and "Are we concerned?"
 +
### The answer may depend on folding in support for a concern requirement.
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===

Revision as of 21:23, 19 September 2018

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2018-09-19
Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation



y Jay Lyle JP Systems
y Yanyan Hu Joint Commission
y Senthil Nachimuthu 3M
y Ken Lord VA
y Rob Hausam IMO
Ben Hamlin NCQA
y Lisa Nelson
Emma Jones Allscripts
y George Dixon Allscripts
Michelle Miller Cerner
Michael Padula Cerner
Stephen Chu

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. status matrix

Minutes

  1. Review of Excel version of status matrix
    1. Coordination with CDA
      1. Lisa is working with Jean Duteau
      2. Can we represent the CDA status matrix as well?
        1. Yes, but do this first.
    2. do we need to scope matrix to one version of FHIR?
    3. Do we need workflow perspective to understand how these resources are generated?
      1. That might be prohibitively expensive: 5 status * 6 status = 30 cases, but including transitions would mean ~30^2.
    4. Inactive hierarchy
      1. Does inactive mean not currently symptomatic but possibly of concern (viz., remission) or no longer present (viz., resolved)?
      2. Seems to be a confusion resulting from the fact that this property tries to support two requirements: "Is it symptomatic?" and "Are we concerned?"
      3. The answer may depend on folding in support for a concern requirement.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • request FHIR example of negated family history
  • stakeholders interested in completion, secure resources
  • review posted document draft, examples


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

Agenda for 9/19:

  • Review Condition Status Matrix

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.