This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Datatypes R2 Issue 45
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Data Types Issue 45: comp name
Introduction
regarding SXPR
surely an R2 issue, but shouldn't the name "Sub-Expression" be harmonized with "comp"? This is the only case of an element/attribute in the ITS having no relation to the name of a property.
? backward compatible.
Discussion
This was from Paul Biron back when Paul and Grahame did the final editorial pass on the XML ITS datatypes prior to ANSI approval
Grahame's answer is no.
comp is ok; what, would you want sub-expression?
can clean up the XML so that it says
"sub-expression is represented as comp"
rather than
"comp is represented as comp"
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues
