Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20090211"
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Issue with RoseTree=== | ||
+ | Austin reported an issue with Rosetree version 4.2.23 seems to work, 4.2.24/4.2.25 do not | ||
===Review Minutes of February 4, 2009=== | ===Review Minutes of February 4, 2009=== | ||
Stechishin/Savage 4-0-0 | Stechishin/Savage 4-0-0 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===MIF Lite=== | ||
+ | Woody briefly reported that W3C had approved the licensing of files (with W3C licenses) in the MIF Lite package. | ||
===Keith Boone Issue=== | ===Keith Boone Issue=== | ||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
Woody patch for other ballots, Austin suggested announce and offer to patch if required | Woody patch for other ballots, Austin suggested announce and offer to patch if required | ||
− | |||
===CDA R2, ICSR=== | ===CDA R2, ICSR=== | ||
CDA R2 -gone to ISO | CDA R2 -gone to ISO | ||
Line 41: | Line 46: | ||
Austin - CMET ballot by domain, CMets advance independently? or whole package? Woody - as before | Austin - CMET ballot by domain, CMets advance independently? or whole package? Woody - as before | ||
based on bylaws | based on bylaws | ||
− | advice of CTO | + | advice of CTO (re-open pool or 2 pool) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==Adjourned at | + | ==Adjourned at 4:47 PM Eastern== |
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 00:03, 12 February 2009
Contents
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 -- 4:00 PM Eastern
Present
Beeler, Kreisler, Seppala, Stechishin, Savage
Agenda
Issue with RoseTree
Austin reported an issue with Rosetree version 4.2.23 seems to work, 4.2.24/4.2.25 do not
Review Minutes of February 4, 2009
Stechishin/Savage 4-0-0
MIF Lite
Woody briefly reported that W3C had approved the licensing of files (with W3C licenses) in the MIF Lite package.
Keith Boone Issue
Invalid_x_Value_Sets_in_NE2008 The affected value set can be corrected very shortly, Patch for NE2008, vocab source design repos, vocab schema, MIF files
Woody patch for other ballots, Austin suggested announce and offer to patch if required
CDA R2, ICSR
CDA R2 -gone to ISO ICSR how to get rid of link to conformance document, implement constraining process
SVN and Pub
Don
Away
Round Table
Gregg - ballot looking models in NE 3/80 have UV all else none (doesn't matter [source name] -Woody) Gregg - want to make sure NE is ready when required (assume SVN is correct)
Gregg - PA inherit scheduling, Rene asked if PA looked a sched universal CMET, create new A_Appointment_Universal but there is one Woody suggested new name A_Appointment_Comprehensive_Universal or deprecate old CMET, do analysis to see if old is used raise in MnM will do 2 ballots, first for comment
Andy - wiki updates proceeding
Austin - CMET ballot by domain, CMets advance independently? or whole package? Woody - as before based on bylaws advice of CTO (re-open pool or 2 pool)