This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Talk:SPL Graphics Specification"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I have no issues with the 96 dpi proposal as long as there is language that permits a higher resolution if there are issues with legibility. Some of the images of labels that will have to ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have no issues with the 96 dpi proposal as long as there is language that permits a higher resolution if there are issues with legibility. | I have no issues with the 96 dpi proposal as long as there is language that permits a higher resolution if there are issues with legibility. | ||
Some of the images of labels that will have to be provided as part of drug listing have some small type that may become illegible at 96 dpi, so I would propose 96 dpi unless characters are not legible and then the lowest resolution where the words become legible. | Some of the images of labels that will have to be provided as part of drug listing have some small type that may become illegible at 96 dpi, so I would propose 96 dpi unless characters are not legible and then the lowest resolution where the words become legible. | ||
| + | --[[User:Trippes|Trippes]] 16:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:37, 26 November 2008
I have no issues with the 96 dpi proposal as long as there is language that permits a higher resolution if there are issues with legibility. Some of the images of labels that will have to be provided as part of drug listing have some small type that may become illegible at 96 dpi, so I would propose 96 dpi unless characters are not legible and then the lowest resolution where the words become legible. --Trippes 16:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
