Difference between revisions of "Specializing reason relationship for flavors of indications"
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) m (→Recommendation(s): typo) |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
== Recommendation(s) == | == Recommendation(s) == | ||
− | Add additional ActRelationship subtypes of “has reason” (RSON), | + | Add additional ActRelationship subtypes of “has reason” (RSON), thus expanding the hierarchy |
for types of reasons (indications). Currently HL7 has: | for types of reasons (indications). Currently HL7 has: | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
- - DIAG - diagnosis of, (i.e., used in the diagnosis of the indicated disease.) | - - DIAG - diagnosis of, (i.e., used in the diagnosis of the indicated disease.) | ||
- - SYMP - symptomatic relief | - - SYMP - symptomatic relief | ||
− | |||
== Rationale == | == Rationale == |
Revision as of 07:18, 17 February 2006
NOTE: Harmonization proposal on public display here for the purpose of commenting and collaborative editing. All your edits are tracked and nothing gets lost. FEEL FREE to improve the proposal and to add any question you want to raise in the discussion. Thanks!
Recommendation for HL7 RIM Change | RECOMMENDATION ID: |
Submitted by: Gunther Schadow | Revision (# and date): 2 |
Date submitted: 20050212 | Committee status: open |
Submitted by: Gunther Schadow | |
NAME: ActRelationship.typeCode for reason |
Contents
Stewards Position
REQUIRED - This table should contain one row for each Steward Committee affected by the recommendation.
TC | RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL STATUS | AFFECTED ENTITIES OF INTEREST TO TC (responsibility level: S=Steward; I=Interested) |
O&O | Unknown | I |
RCRIM | Unknown | I |
PC | Unknown | I |
Issue
Need to be more specific about the nature of an indication (reason).
Current State
Has reason (RSON) has one specialization already: mitigates (MTGT). No other place to qualify reasons to say how specifically something is a reason.
Recommendation(s)
Add additional ActRelationship subtypes of “has reason” (RSON), thus expanding the hierarchy for types of reasons (indications). Currently HL7 has:
- RSON - has reason (indication) - - MTGT - mitigates
and we can propose to add:
- - MTGT.ADJ - adjuct mitigation - - CURE - curative indication - - CURE.ADJ - adjunct curative indication - - DIAG - diagnosis of, (i.e., used in the diagnosis of the indicated disease.) - - SYMP - symptomatic relief
Rationale
The change is a logical extension of the finer nuances that are already been made with the difference between has-reason and mitigates, it's necessary to describe indications better.
The change is motivated to complete the U.S. national SPL project with FDA and all of Pharma Industry to provide improved drug labeling in HL7 v3 format. It is implementing a requirement from the Physician’s Labeling Rule that became effective in January 2006.
Workaround Considered
Attaching some arbitrary observation, but that would be an abuse of observations.
For the use case at hand -- indication for treatment -- we could use a has-generalization to a SubstanceAdministration code which would classify the administration act as to its intent to mitigate, cure, diagnose, etc. This seems the wrong place to do it, as we are truly qualifying the reason or rationale of administering a substance.
Recommended Action Items
- Implement the proposed solution