This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Proposal: Add new Parameter to Provider Detail Query"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Author: René Spronk, on behalf of [http://www.nictiz.nl/ NICTIZ], the Netherlands | *Author: René Spronk, on behalf of [http://www.nictiz.nl/ NICTIZ], the Netherlands | ||
| − | == | + | ==Proposal== |
The Provider Detail Query (PRPM_RM306000UV) allows one to query for matching providers. | The Provider Detail Query (PRPM_RM306000UV) allows one to query for matching providers. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
*20080817 Q4, WGM vancouver, agreed in PA (5-0-2) | *20080817 Q4, WGM vancouver, agreed in PA (5-0-2) | ||
| − | *20080818 Given that PROV isn't an appropriate roleclass, the provider topic can't be | + | *20080818 Given that PROV isn't an appropriate roleclass, the provider topic can't be used to cover this use-case. The Human Resources topic is more applicable. The motion of yesterday therefore is moot. |
Latest revision as of 11:07, 16 January 2010
- Committee: PAFM
- Timing: WGM Vancouver, September 2008
- Author: René Spronk, on behalf of NICTIZ, the Netherlands
Proposal
The Provider Detail Query (PRPM_RM306000UV) allows one to query for matching providers.
In the Dutch national infrastructure the provider.id isn't a unique identifier of a healthcare provider, the tuple (provider.id, scoping organization.id) does form a unique identifier.
I propose that a OrganizationId queryParameter be added to the Provider Detail Query (PRPM_RM306000UV) static model.
Discussion
- 20080817 Q4, WGM vancouver, agreed in PA (5-0-2)
- 20080818 Given that PROV isn't an appropriate roleclass, the provider topic can't be used to cover this use-case. The Human Resources topic is more applicable. The motion of yesterday therefore is moot.
