This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 25 May 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to Negation Minutes ==Minutes== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspac...") |
|||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
# Motion from Montreal | # Motion from Montreal | ||
## We found the following embedded in the motion(s): | ## We found the following embedded in the motion(s): | ||
| − | ### requirements: avoid counterintuitive semantics, intractability (hence, BL not a good idea in information model or semantics) | + | ### requirements: avoid counterintuitive semantics, intractability (hence, BL not a good idea in information model or semantics) (agreed) |
| − | ### principles: consistency (if we clarify boundaries) | + | #### It may be possible to address semantic issue with DL independently of information modeling. |
| + | ### principles: consistency (if we clarify boundaries) (agreed) | ||
### design guidance: | ### design guidance: | ||
| − | #### avoid Boolean negation in information models | + | #### avoid Boolean negation in information models (agreed) |
| − | #### | + | #### avoid negation in unary code patterns (unclear) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 25 May 2016
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2016-05-25 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
| y | Richard Esmond | ||
| y | Gerard Freriks | ||
| y | Rob Hausam | ||
| y | Susan Barber | ||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Review of motion from Montreal; identify a) requirements, b) principles, c) design guidance
- Options for ensuring coverage of use case list
- Question of use case application list
- Scenario patterns: useful?
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Motion from Montreal
- We found the following embedded in the motion(s):
- requirements: avoid counterintuitive semantics, intractability (hence, BL not a good idea in information model or semantics) (agreed)
- It may be possible to address semantic issue with DL independently of information modeling.
- principles: consistency (if we clarify boundaries) (agreed)
- design guidance:
- avoid Boolean negation in information models (agreed)
- avoid negation in unary code patterns (unclear)
- requirements: avoid counterintuitive semantics, intractability (hence, BL not a good idea in information model or semantics) (agreed)
- We found the following embedded in the motion(s):
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
