Harmonization: QueryRequestLimit vocabulary

Editing of harmonization proposals prior to a harmonization meeting is restricted to the proposal submitter and the co-chairs of the steward comittee. Other changes will be undone. Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this proposal.

Recommendation for HL7 RIM Change	RECOMMENDATION ID:
Sponsored by: INM	Approval date by committee:
Revision (# and date): 20061222	Date submitted:
Editor/Author: Rene Spronk
PROPOSALNAME: QueryRequestLimit vocabulary

Stewards Position

REQUIRED - This table should contain one row for each Steward Committee affected by the recommendation.

TC	RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL STATUS	AFFECTED ENTITIES OF INTEREST TO TC (responsibility level: S=Steward; I=Interested)
INM	Unknown	S

Issue

One paragraph summary of the issue and the solution as detailed in this proposal.

Recommendation(s)

If the proposal requests RIM structure as well as vocabulary changes then please document them in separate sections. The proposal should be as atomic as possible. It's better to have 5 individual proposals then 1 proposal that attempts to group them.

20060915, INM:

• Add "Record" (ananymous)
• Bytes is tricky, because of ITS dependent sizes. Is this a contract issue, or a run time issue? Courtesy request? Strawvote: 1-15-3

RIM Recommendation(s)

• None.

Vocabulary Recommendation(s)

Please use the fully specified names when inserting/adding/changing vocabularies, including full parentage of the vocabulary.

Rationale

Any additional information needed to understand, evaluate or implement the recommendation, such as model fragments or other context that demonstrates use of the requested change. Include implications.

Recommended Action Items

• Implement the proposed solution