|
|
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| | | | |
| | ==[[Current Open FHIR CPs]]== | | ==[[Current Open FHIR CPs]]== |
| − |
| |
| − | November 4, 2015
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5524 5524] Consent shouldn't be a sub-type of Contract (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5525 5525] Consent Directive does not appear to be aligned with the 80% (Lloyd McKenzie) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6285 6285] Proposal for ConsentDirective stepping stones (John Moehrke) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6861 6861] 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6864 6864] 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6865 6865] 2015May sdc #82 - Bundle with consent + request? (James Kretz) Considered for Future Use
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7252 7252] 2015May core #361 - ConsentDirective appears US-specific (Lloyd McKenzie) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7253 7253] 2015May core #362 - ConsentDirective violates DSTU 2 rules (Lloyd McKenzie) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7531 7531] 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7532 7532] 2015May core #823 - ConsentDirective documentation (Grahame Grieve) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7533 7533] 2015May core #824 - ConsentDirective as a profile (Grahame Grieve) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7871 7871] 2015May core #1191 - Where is consent status, advance directive details? Contract resource is inappropriate (Michelle Miller) None
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5905 5905] Contract.binding is the same as the intent of Consent.legal (John Moehrke) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5906 5906] Contract.signer needs to be clarified (John Moehrke) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5907 5907] Contract.action is not defined (John Moehrke) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6137 6137] Consent has no examples (Lloyd McKenzie) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6284 6284] ConsentDirective vs Contract (John Moehrke) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7691 7691] 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7752 7752] 2015May core #1073 - Replace value set with FHIR Signer Type value set (Kathleen Connor) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7770 7770] 2015May core #1091 - Rename Contract - Consent is not a Contract (Keith Boone) Not Related
| |
| − | *[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=7771 7771] 2015May core #1092 - Does electronic exchange of contracts fit in the 80%? (Keith Boone) Not Related
| |
| | | | |
| | ==FHIR Consent Directive Artifacts== | | ==FHIR Consent Directive Artifacts== |
Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings
[Back to HL7 Patient Friendly Language Consent Directive Project]
Weekly meeting
Wednesdays 6:00 PM Eastern Time
Call Agenda, Attendance, and Call Notes
Purpose
To track the progress of the HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project.
Prior to 10/27/2015, some of this content was kept on the [HL7 Patient Friendly Language Consent Directive Project] page.
FHIR Consent Directive Artifacts
Work breakdown
Work on the existing path, thus deferring resolution of "Consent as a Resource" vs "Consent as a Profile on Contract". It is best to get progress, and this difference is holding progress. Once we make more progress we can resolve and adjust.
- Start effort on developing this effort as an Implementation Guide (IG)
- Have many profiles within the IG
- Simple acknowledgement without deviations... Equivalent to BPPC
- Opt-In, Opt-Out, Opt-Out-fully, etc
- Consent with explicitly authorized individuals
- organization or individual or service delivery location
- Consent with explicitly identified types of objects to exclude
- By clinical type of data
- By repository holding that data
- Consent with explicitly identified objects to exclude
- Consent with explicitly identified object and any other object related to that object (order number --> all results)(e.g. accession number)
- Consents with explicitly identified author to include/exclude
- Defining combination of terms within a single policy
- Defining combination of terms when they are individual policies (opt-out + opt-in-for-Bob != opt-in-for-Bob + opt-out)
- Explain how Consent is related to a Questionnaire presented to a patient
- Produce a set of Consent logical Principles
- e.g. when writing rules, you are only adding things into scope
- Explain how CDA-ConsentDirective can inform FHIR Consent.
- ???
