This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 74"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Disposition: For the moment, add a NullFlavor UNC. When CD & nullFlavor are re-organised to resolve the NullFlavor issues associated with OTH, this nullFlavor will probably be refactored in favor of a different approach to meet the same requirement. | Disposition: For the moment, add a NullFlavor UNC. When CD & nullFlavor are re-organised to resolve the NullFlavor issues associated with OTH, this nullFlavor will probably be refactored in favor of a different approach to meet the same requirement. | ||
− | + | Approved (Motion Grahame/Stan) | |
== Links == | == Links == | ||
Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] | Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] |
Revision as of 23:51, 10 January 2007
Data Types Issue 54: UNC NullFlavor
Introduction
Some users/developers/implementors are unable or too lazy to encode a CD properly. Other users would like to know so that they can be caught out later. So it would be nice to add a nullFlavor code to suggest that a receiver might well invest in recoding the concept.
Discussion
Disposition: For the moment, add a NullFlavor UNC. When CD & nullFlavor are re-organised to resolve the NullFlavor issues associated with OTH, this nullFlavor will probably be refactored in favor of a different approach to meet the same requirement.
Approved (Motion Grahame/Stan)
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues