This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 30"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
| + | Why doesn't BAG have a ".literal" property? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Proposal: I guess a simple literal would just be the one for list. Another literal | ||
| + | form could allow for numbers too. Something like: | ||
| + | "[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]" | ||
? backward compatible. | ? backward compatible. | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 16 May 2006
Data Types Issue 30: Add Bag.literal
Introduction
Why doesn't BAG have a ".literal" property?
Proposal: I guess a simple literal would just be the one for list. Another literal form could allow for numbers too. Something like:
"[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]"
? backward compatible.
Discussion
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues
