Difference between revisions of "Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers"

Revision as of 18:41, 12 January 2010

Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers

Opened 2007-01-11
Assigned to: Patrick Loyd
Old action item 1133

Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers, related to BehaviorialContract wrapper.

Charlie McCay, new, 20070111
- During discussion Charlie thought an alternative approach, suing Headers (siblings) instead of Wrappers (parent/child). The INM committee would like to see a proposal related to this before making any motions.
20070502: WGM: Open for now, probably subsumed by Wrappers R2.
20070618: Telcon:** abandoned with guilt — this is not something that I have current interests in – I suggest that they be either closed, or passed to whoveer is working on the follow-on “wrappers R2” project — the wrappers R2 project was timeboxed, and we did not achieve sufficient momentum to deliver within the timebox and it should be formally closed if that has not already happened.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 **During discussion Charlie thought an alternative approach, suing Headers (siblings) instead of Wrappers (parent/child). The INM committee would like to see a proposal related to this before making any motions.
 *20070502: WGM: Open for now, probably subsumed by Wrappers R2.
-*20070618: Telcon: Doug will talk to Charlie
+*20070618: Telcon:** abandoned with guilt — this is not something that I have current interests in – I suggest that they be either closed, or passed to whoveer is working on the follow-on “wrappers R2” project — the wrappers R2 project was timeboxed, and we did not achieve sufficient momentum to deliver within the timebox and it should be formally closed if that has not already happened.
-*20080114:WGM:Scott will ping Charlie
-*20100112:Charlie:** again abandoned with guilt – suggest that someone who has an immediate and pressing interest in specifying the use of attachments pick this up – I can see that there is something useful to be done here, but again I do not want to be a bottleneck to letting it happen.  If no-one is available to pick it up now, then I suggest that the action be closed rather than maintain an expectation that I will write something up.