This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2018-06-13 SGB Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-06-13 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
x | Calvin Beebe | ||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Russ Hamm | |||
Tony Julian | |||
x | Paul Knapp | ||
Ewout Kramer | |||
x | Austin Kreisler | ||
x | Wayne Kubick | ||
x | Thom Kuhn | ||
Ken McCaslin | |||
x | Rik Smithies | ||
Sandy Stuart | |||
Quorum: Chair + 4 |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Complete
- Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
- Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- SGB Communication Plan
- Large architectures coming in
- CIMI MG followup
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
- MOTION to approve: Austin/Calvin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Action Items
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Carry forward
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Complete
- Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
- ACTION: Keep here for the time being – add to upcoming agenda
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Carry forward
- Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
- Came up on FMG in regards to implementation guides. They are going to look for concrete examples of edge cases to see if there are instances occurring; if so, we could develop any necessary exceptions to the rule.
- Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
- Anne has asked for a date they can send it out; will adjust due date to two weeks following that date
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
- MOTION to approve Yan and defer Casey until we determine membership status: Wayne/Austin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Reviewed membership status – receives benefit through company but is not a voting member. Discussion over whether we should require individual or voting membership to be a named member of committees. Need to have voting experience to be on a management group.
- AMENDED MOTION to recommend to the TSC to appoint YAN to the CDAMG, decline, Casey, and defer the decision on Raychelle pending further information.
- VOTE: All in favor
- ACTION: Paul to reach out to Raychelle to determine if she has direct participation in HL7 meetings, both face to face and calls, as we would like to see attendance at 2 out of 3 WGMs and regular participation on calls/in WG activities. Also need to ask about ballot participation/lack of voting membership.
- Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Carry forward:
- Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- SGB Communication Plan
- Large architectures coming in
- CIMI MG followup
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved