This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2018-06-13 SGB Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
 
===============================================================================--->
 
===============================================================================--->
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Calvin Beebe
+
|x || Calvin Beebe
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ||Lorraine Constable
 
| ||Lorraine Constable
Line 45: Line 45:
 
| || Tony Julian  
 
| || Tony Julian  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Paul Knapp
+
| x|| Paul Knapp
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || Ewout Kramer
 
| || Ewout Kramer
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Austin Kreisler
+
|x || Austin Kreisler
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Wayne Kubick
+
|x || Wayne Kubick
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Thom Kuhn
+
|x || Thom Kuhn
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || Ken McCaslin
 
| || Ken McCaslin
 
|-
 
|-
−
| || Rik Smithies
+
| x|| Rik Smithies
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || Sandy Stuart
 
| || Sandy Stuart
Line 113: Line 113:
 
**Ownership of content
 
**Ownership of content
 
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
 
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
−
 
−
 
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
−
 
+
*Agenda review
 +
*Approve Minutes of [[2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call]]
 +
**MOTION to approve: Austin/Calvin
 +
**VOTE: All in favor
 +
*Action Items
 +
**Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
 +
***Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
 +
****Carry forward
 +
**Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
 +
***Complete
 +
**Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
 +
***ACTION: Keep here for the time being – add to upcoming agenda
 +
**Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
 +
***Carry forward
 +
**Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
 +
***Came up on FMG in regards to implementation guides. They are going to look for concrete examples of edge cases to see if there are instances occurring; if so, we could develop any necessary exceptions to the rule.
 +
**Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
 +
***Anne has asked for a date they can send it out; will adjust due date to two weeks following that date
 +
*Discussion Topics
 +
**Additional candidates for CDAMG
 +
***Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
 +
****MOTION to approve Yan and defer Casey until we determine membership status: Wayne/Austin
 +
****VOTE: All in favor
 +
*****Reviewed membership status – receives benefit through company but is not a voting member. Discussion over whether we should require individual or voting membership to be a named member of committees. Need to have voting experience to be on a management group.
 +
****AMENDED MOTION to recommend to the TSC to appoint YAN to the CDAMG, decline, Casey, and defer the decision on Raychelle pending further information.
 +
****VOTE: All in favor
 +
*****ACTION: Paul to reach out to Raychelle to determine if she has direct participation in HL7 meetings, both face to face and calls, as we would like to see attendance at 2 out of 3 WGMs and regular participation on calls/in WG activities. Also need to ask about ballot participation/lack of voting membership.
 +
*Carry forward:
 +
**Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources
 +
**Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Artifact_Governance_Process FHIR artifact governance process]
 +
**SGB Communication Plan
 +
**Large architectures coming in
 +
**CIMI MG followup
 +
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop''']
 +
*Parking Lot
 +
**Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
 +
**Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
 +
**Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
 +
**Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
 +
**Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
 +
**Review Mission and Charter
 +
**Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
 +
**Technical Alignments Between Product Families
 +
**How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
 +
**Precept on bringing in large projects
 +
**Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
 +
**Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
 +
**BAM guidance on process for product adoption
 +
**Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- '''to do in April/before Cologne'''
 +
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
 +
**Ownership of content
 +
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
  
  
Line 148: Line 197:
  
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
−
*[[2018-mm-dd SGB Conference Call]]
+
*[[2018-06-20 SGB Conference Call]]
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved
 
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved

Revision as of 21:42, 19 June 2018

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637

Date: 2018-06-13
Time: 10:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator Paul/Lorraine Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


x Calvin Beebe
Lorraine Constable
Russ Hamm
Tony Julian
x Paul Knapp
Ewout Kramer
x Austin Kreisler
x Wayne Kubick
x Thom Kuhn
Ken McCaslin
x Rik Smithies
Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
  • Action Items
    • Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
      • Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
    • Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
      • Complete
    • Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
    • Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
    • Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
    • Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
  • Discussion Topics
  • Parking Lot
    • Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
    • Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
    • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
    • Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
    • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
    • Review Mission and Charter
    • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
    • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
    • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
    • Precept on bringing in large projects
    • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
    • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
    • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
    • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
    • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
    • Ownership of content
    • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?

Minutes

  • Agenda review
  • Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
    • MOTION to approve: Austin/Calvin
    • VOTE: All in favor
  • Action Items
    • Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
      • Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
        • Carry forward
    • Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
      • Complete
    • Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
      • ACTION: Keep here for the time being – add to upcoming agenda
    • Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
      • Carry forward
    • Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
      • Came up on FMG in regards to implementation guides. They are going to look for concrete examples of edge cases to see if there are instances occurring; if so, we could develop any necessary exceptions to the rule.
    • Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
      • Anne has asked for a date they can send it out; will adjust due date to two weeks following that date
  • Discussion Topics
    • Additional candidates for CDAMG
      • Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
        • MOTION to approve Yan and defer Casey until we determine membership status: Wayne/Austin
        • VOTE: All in favor
          • Reviewed membership status – receives benefit through company but is not a voting member. Discussion over whether we should require individual or voting membership to be a named member of committees. Need to have voting experience to be on a management group.
        • AMENDED MOTION to recommend to the TSC to appoint YAN to the CDAMG, decline, Casey, and defer the decision on Raychelle pending further information.
        • VOTE: All in favor
          • ACTION: Paul to reach out to Raychelle to determine if she has direct participation in HL7 meetings, both face to face and calls, as we would like to see attendance at 2 out of 3 WGMs and regular participation on calls/in WG activities. Also need to ask about ballot participation/lack of voting membership.
  • Carry forward:
  • Parking Lot
    • Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
    • Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
    • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
    • Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
    • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
    • Review Mission and Charter
    • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
    • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
    • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
    • Precept on bringing in large projects
    • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
    • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
    • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
    • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
    • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
    • Ownership of content
    • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?


Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2018-06-13_SGB_Conference_Call&oldid=158378"