This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-06-13 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Calvin Beebe | + | |x || Calvin Beebe |
|- | |- | ||
| ||Lorraine Constable | | ||Lorraine Constable | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| || Tony Julian | | || Tony Julian | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Paul Knapp | + | | x|| Paul Knapp |
|- | |- | ||
| || Ewout Kramer | | || Ewout Kramer | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Austin Kreisler | + | |x || Austin Kreisler |
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Wayne Kubick | + | |x || Wayne Kubick |
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Thom Kuhn | + | |x || Thom Kuhn |
|- | |- | ||
| || Ken McCaslin | | || Ken McCaslin | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Rik Smithies | + | | x|| Rik Smithies |
|- | |- | ||
| || Sandy Stuart | | || Sandy Stuart | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
**Ownership of content | **Ownership of content | ||
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model? | **What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
− | + | *Agenda review | |
+ | *Approve Minutes of [[2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call]] | ||
+ | **MOTION to approve: Austin/Calvin | ||
+ | **VOTE: All in favor | ||
+ | *Action Items | ||
+ | **Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3 | ||
+ | ***Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient | ||
+ | ****Carry forward | ||
+ | **Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept | ||
+ | ***Complete | ||
+ | **Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda | ||
+ | ***ACTION: Keep here for the time being – add to upcoming agenda | ||
+ | **Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue | ||
+ | ***Carry forward | ||
+ | **Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative | ||
+ | ***Came up on FMG in regards to implementation guides. They are going to look for concrete examples of edge cases to see if there are instances occurring; if so, we could develop any necessary exceptions to the rule. | ||
+ | **Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership | ||
+ | ***Anne has asked for a date they can send it out; will adjust due date to two weeks following that date | ||
+ | *Discussion Topics | ||
+ | **Additional candidates for CDAMG | ||
+ | ***Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez | ||
+ | ****MOTION to approve Yan and defer Casey until we determine membership status: Wayne/Austin | ||
+ | ****VOTE: All in favor | ||
+ | *****Reviewed membership status – receives benefit through company but is not a voting member. Discussion over whether we should require individual or voting membership to be a named member of committees. Need to have voting experience to be on a management group. | ||
+ | ****AMENDED MOTION to recommend to the TSC to appoint YAN to the CDAMG, decline, Casey, and defer the decision on Raychelle pending further information. | ||
+ | ****VOTE: All in favor | ||
+ | *****ACTION: Paul to reach out to Raychelle to determine if she has direct participation in HL7 meetings, both face to face and calls, as we would like to see attendance at 2 out of 3 WGMs and regular participation on calls/in WG activities. Also need to ask about ballot participation/lack of voting membership. | ||
+ | *Carry forward: | ||
+ | **Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources | ||
+ | **Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Artifact_Governance_Process FHIR artifact governance process] | ||
+ | **SGB Communication Plan | ||
+ | **Large architectures coming in | ||
+ | **CIMI MG followup | ||
+ | **[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop'''] | ||
+ | *Parking Lot | ||
+ | **Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM | ||
+ | **Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR | ||
+ | **Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope | ||
+ | **Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change | ||
+ | **Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM | ||
+ | **Review Mission and Charter | ||
+ | **Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities | ||
+ | **Technical Alignments Between Product Families | ||
+ | **How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. | ||
+ | **Precept on bringing in large projects | ||
+ | **Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts | ||
+ | **Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans? | ||
+ | **BAM guidance on process for product adoption | ||
+ | **Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- '''to do in April/before Cologne''' | ||
+ | **[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB | ||
+ | **Ownership of content | ||
+ | **What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model? | ||
Line 148: | Line 197: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
− | *[[2018- | + | *[[2018-06-20 SGB Conference Call]] |
|} | |} | ||
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved |
Revision as of 21:42, 19 June 2018
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-06-13 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
x | Calvin Beebe | ||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Russ Hamm | |||
Tony Julian | |||
x | Paul Knapp | ||
Ewout Kramer | |||
x | Austin Kreisler | ||
x | Wayne Kubick | ||
x | Thom Kuhn | ||
Ken McCaslin | |||
x | Rik Smithies | ||
Sandy Stuart | |||
Quorum: Chair + 4 |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Complete
- Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
- Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- SGB Communication Plan
- Large architectures coming in
- CIMI MG followup
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-06-06_SGB_Conference_Call
- MOTION to approve: Austin/Calvin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Action Items
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Carry forward
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Complete
- Add balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR and continuous maintenance task force to TSC agenda
- ACTION: Keep here for the time being – add to upcoming agenda
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Carry forward
- Paul to draft message to management groups/TSC regarding the precept that you can’t have a normative artifact if it has dependencies on artifacts which aren’t themselves Normative
- Came up on FMG in regards to implementation guides. They are going to look for concrete examples of edge cases to see if there are instances occurring; if so, we could develop any necessary exceptions to the rule.
- Anne to send invitation for additional V2MG participation to Andrea/Pat for distribution to membership
- Anne has asked for a date they can send it out; will adjust due date to two weeks following that date
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
- MOTION to approve Yan and defer Casey until we determine membership status: Wayne/Austin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Reviewed membership status – receives benefit through company but is not a voting member. Discussion over whether we should require individual or voting membership to be a named member of committees. Need to have voting experience to be on a management group.
- AMENDED MOTION to recommend to the TSC to appoint YAN to the CDAMG, decline, Casey, and defer the decision on Raychelle pending further information.
- VOTE: All in favor
- ACTION: Paul to reach out to Raychelle to determine if she has direct participation in HL7 meetings, both face to face and calls, as we would like to see attendance at 2 out of 3 WGMs and regular participation on calls/in WG activities. Also need to ask about ballot participation/lack of voting membership.
- Nominations for Yan Heras, Casey Thompson, Raychelle Fernandez
- Additional candidates for CDAMG
- Carry forward:
- Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- SGB Communication Plan
- Large architectures coming in
- CIMI MG followup
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved