This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20150916 FMG concall
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2015-09-16 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
Chair: | Note taker(s): Anne W. |
Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
Co chairs | David Hay | Lloyd McKenzie | ||||
ex-officio | Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs |
. | John Quinn, CTO |
Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
Hans Buitendijk | Brian Postlethwaite | Paul Knapp | Anne W., scribe | ||||
Josh Mandel | John Moehrke | Brian Pech | |||||
. |
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 20150909_FMG_concall
- Administrative
- Action items
- Lloyd to review DSTU 2 QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
- Lloyd will send out email to WGs reminding them that 1) if they have outstanding warnings, they've got 4 or 5 days left to get those clear or be dropped to draft and 2) look at QA checklist and, if aiming for level 4 or higher, make sure scopes tab is complete. Will also send out appeal to those in production to let us know what resources they are using.
- Grahame will send out same call on implementers list.
- Action items
- Discussion Topics
- FMM5 calls for inclusion of the artifact in two formal publication release cycles.
- Does that mean that the content has to have been DSTU in both versions or whether it's ok for it to be draft.
- Do the cycles need to be consecutive - I.e. can something be in one release, yanked for a release (or dropped to a lower status), then put back for a release and still meet the criterion?
- Does the normative content have to be what was previously published?
- Security would like AuditEvent & SecurityEvent to be back in as DSTU (and would like permission to update in 2.1)
- Security would like to make a substantive change to introduction section to add guidance
- How to we add the review of profiles against resources by the WGs responsible for those resources into the timeline process
- Policy around FHIR-related project proposals that go to TSC without FMG approval
- Will the FMG be an interested party/cosponsor of the ArB project to map FHIR specs to the RIM? Should FIWG be leading the project?
- Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?
- FMM5 calls for inclusion of the artifact in two formal publication release cycles.
- Future Topics
- What are our criteria for inclusion of content in DSTU 2.1?
- What are the rules for FMM levels for pages and for profiles/IGs?
- Given that not all resources will be updating in DSTU 2.1, how do we manage the build environment?
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International