CMHAFF call, Thursday, August 24

ATTENDEES: Adamu Haruna, Gary Dickinson, David Tao

AGENDA:

• Review/Approve specific content changes
  • DKT4 New decision tree -- is this a good basis?
  • DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference?
  • DKT15 Should Usability conformance criteria be consolidated?
  • DKT32 Is automatic timeout justified as SHALL?
  • DKT36-37 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
  • DKT39 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
  • DKT40-42 new "Interoperability" section: should more be said?
  • DKT48 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
  • DKT54 Is there a good starting point or reference for a Glossary? Should we have our own?
  • DKT55 Should Windows platform considerations be included or not?
• San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations
  • Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM
  • Plan which topics are most in need of discussion for face-to-face time in San Diego

NEXT WEEK

• Nathan agreed to recommend which (if any) criteria from Finland should be added to cMHAFF. This will be done on August 31st.
  • File:National authorisation criteria of Finnish PHR v2.2 Nokia Translation.xlsx -- FINNISH National Authorisation (Certification) Criteria for PHR (unofficial translation into English) Contains approximately 80 criteria in 6 categories. (NATHAN BOTTS)