This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Agenda for 25-Oct-2006''' | '''Agenda for 25-Oct-2006''' | ||
#Role call and agenda OK | #Role call and agenda OK | ||
| − | |||
#Tools update - PubDb and Design Repository postings | #Tools update - PubDb and Design Repository postings | ||
#Summary of "Intent to Ballot" notices - Don Lloyd | #Summary of "Intent to Ballot" notices - Don Lloyd | ||
| + | #Change and revision mark usage (added by Gregg) | ||
#Around the table | #Around the table | ||
| − | |||
#Other Business | #Other Business | ||
#Adjourn | #Adjourn | ||
| + | #'''???''' More on Wiki Editing '''???''' | ||
:Was this official notification process to pubs of intent to publish really helpful? Given that there was a short period between the WGM and the initial publication date everybody (within INM) went into a mad scramble this time to get 10 forms in for pubs, then 10 RFIs, supporting project statements etc. Some of that is required by ANSI, but could the process of notifying pubs be simplified? It just adds yet another form, another date and more red tape.. In other words: was the additional value to YOU really worth the trouble caused to others? [[User:Rene spronk|Rene spronk]] 23:40, 24 October 2006 (CDT) | :Was this official notification process to pubs of intent to publish really helpful? Given that there was a short period between the WGM and the initial publication date everybody (within INM) went into a mad scramble this time to get 10 forms in for pubs, then 10 RFIs, supporting project statements etc. Some of that is required by ANSI, but could the process of notifying pubs be simplified? It just adds yet another form, another date and more red tape.. In other words: was the additional value to YOU really worth the trouble caused to others? [[User:Rene spronk|Rene spronk]] 23:40, 24 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 25 October 2006
Return to Publishing Committee
Agenda for 25-Oct-2006
- Role call and agenda OK
- Tools update - PubDb and Design Repository postings
- Summary of "Intent to Ballot" notices - Don Lloyd
- Change and revision mark usage (added by Gregg)
- Around the table
- Other Business
- Adjourn
- ??? More on Wiki Editing ???
- Was this official notification process to pubs of intent to publish really helpful? Given that there was a short period between the WGM and the initial publication date everybody (within INM) went into a mad scramble this time to get 10 forms in for pubs, then 10 RFIs, supporting project statements etc. Some of that is required by ANSI, but could the process of notifying pubs be simplified? It just adds yet another form, another date and more red tape.. In other words: was the additional value to YOU really worth the trouble caused to others? Rene spronk 23:40, 24 October 2006 (CDT)
