Difference between revisions of "201808 Case Reporting"
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:Precondition: Original trigger code value sets exist on test server | :Precondition: Original trigger code value sets exist on test server | ||
:Success Criteria: Provider organization is notified and receives a copy of any trigger code value sets that are updated | :Success Criteria: Provider organization is notified and receives a copy of any trigger code value sets that are updated | ||
+ | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Ingest Trigger Codes into EHR === | ||
+ | :Action: Provider organization receives a trigger code update, and ingests the trigger codes into their EHR to support case report initiation. | ||
+ | :Precondition: Trigger codes updates have been received by provider organization | ||
+ | :Success Criteria: Trigger code updates successfully ingested into EHR | ||
:Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 1 November 2017
Electronic Case Reporting
Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group
Public Health (PH)
Justification
Electronic case reporting has been maturing in the CDA product family, and FHIR case reporting specifications are now also being being developed. This track will explore various aspects of FHIR case reporting as they mature, beginning with trigger code representation and dissemination, expanding to decision support logic and other transactions to support case reporting and management as those aspects mature in future Connectathons. This track could include discussions on additional resource needs for these use cases.
Proposed Track Lead
- John Loonsk
- Rick Geimer
See Connectathon_Track_Lead_Responsibilities
Expected participants
- APHL
- CDC
- CGI Federal
- Epic
- Lantana Consulting Group
Roles
Please include information here regarding how much advance preparation will be required if creating a client and/or server.
Public Health
Responsible for managing and disseminating trigger codes and decision logic.
Public Health Agency
Jurisdiction or agency that will receive and manage case reports, and at times send and/or receive reportability responses.
Intermediaries
Organizations in the information flow between a health care organization and a public health agency. Examples include HIEs, the shared platform supported by APHL and CSTE, etc.
Health Care Organization
Organization that submits case reports based on trigger codes, and receives trigger code updates and reportability responses. The health care organization can be supported by an EHR vendor in this role.
Scenarios
Update Trigger Codes on Public Health FHIR Server
- Action: Public Health determines that the current trigger code value sets require an update. The appropriate value sets are updated using PUT. Also update trigger codes as a Bundle of ValueSet resources so they can be updated as a whole set.
- Precondition: Original trigger code value sets exist on test server
- Success Criteria: Value sets are successfully updated and can be retrieved on demand with GET
- Bonus point:
Subscribe to Trigger Code Updates
- Action: Provider organization uses Subscription to subscribe to changes to trigger code value sets (or value set Bundle) using any legal notification method.
- Precondition: Original trigger code value sets exist on test server
- Success Criteria: Provider organization is notified and receives a copy of any trigger code value sets that are updated
- Bonus point:
Ingest Trigger Codes into EHR
- Action: Provider organization receives a trigger code update, and ingests the trigger codes into their EHR to support case report initiation.
- Precondition: Trigger codes updates have been received by provider organization
- Success Criteria: Trigger code updates successfully ingested into EHR
- Bonus point: