This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

November 20, 2018 CBCP Conference Call

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to CBCP Main Page

November 20, 2018 CBCP Conference Call

Attendees

Back to CBCP Main Page

Member Name x Member Name x Member Name x Member Name
x Johnathan ColemanCBCP Co-Chair x Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCP Co-Chair . Jim Kretz CBCP Co-Chair x David Pyke CBCP Co-Chair
x Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair . Mike Davis . John Moehrke Security Co-Chair . Diana Proud-Madruga
. Chris Shawn x Irina Connelly . Joe Lamy . Greg Linden
x Dave Silver x Francisco Jauregui x Mark Meadows . Jack Wallace
x David Staggs . Beth Pumo . Amber Patel x Becky Angeles
. Mohammad Jafari x Ken Salyards . Bonnie Young x Greg White
x Katie Sullivan x [mailto:] . [mailto: ] x [mailto:

Back to CBCP Main Page


Agenda DRAFT

  1. Roll Call, Agenda Review
  2. Meeting Minutes approval:
  3. eLTSS Update - Irina / Becky
  4. Review eLTSS FHIR IG proposal
  5. DS4P Reaffirmation Ballot - Update
  6. CBCP FHIR


Meeting Minutes DRAFT

Meeting Chair: Johnathan

  • review of agenda, roll call

Motion to approve: (Dave/Jim) Vote: Abstentions: none; Against: none; Approval: 17 (Suzanne to confirm #, some duplicates on call)

eLTSS Ballot Reconciliation

  • reviewed remaining (comments #66-75)
  • Questions? none

eLTSS IG for May 2019 Ballot

  • Motion: (Suzanne/Becky) to approve comment resolutions

NO further discussion *abstentions: none; Against: none; Approve: 17 (Suzanne to confirm)

  • with approval the IG as shown will be sent over to FHIR Management group for approval

Motion to approval (Dave/Jim) Vote: Abstentions: none; Against: none; Approval: 17 (No further discussion)


DS4P Reaffirmation

  • several ballots up for reaffirmation
  • Thursday December 6th is close date for voting in January ballot

CBCP FHIR FHIR Consent / Consent-Contract Discovery White Paper

  • reviewed Contract Consent Comparison Table/paper
  • moving forward - possibly ballot as a white paper
    • this was designed for internal use to make sure all the players are on the same place--roles and such, for future work
  • for decision maker especially for implementers
    • not something that needs to be decide today
  • to inform internally, pilots and vendors, implementers of what the capabilities are and for use with different use cases...
  • no additional questions/comments made


additional questions/agenda items

Motion to adjourn (Jim) Meeting adjourned at 1053 Arizona Time --Suzannegw (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2018 (EST)