Negation Requirements Project Minutes 2 August 2017

From HL7Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2017-08-02
Time: 11:00-12:00 ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation


y Jay Lyle JP Systems
y Lisa Nelson
y Rob Hausam
y Craig Newman
Rita Pyle
Richard Esmond
Andrew Haslam
Floyd Eisenberg
Susan Barber
Larry McKnight
Galen Mulrooney
Kurt Allen
Jim Case
Juliet Rubini
Hank Mayers

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. Review of suggested quality measures (eCQI)
  3. Other usage cases
  4. Class coverage & definition
  5. Impact on problem statement


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. Motivations for attending
    1. Craig: 5 years ago, OO discussion on how to record Salmonella not found in V2. For a Sal specific test, Negative works fine. For a general Micro ID test, Sal means Sal found. If you find E coli but no Sal, how do you say no Sal?
    2. Lisa
      1. How to harmonize CDA & FHIR so you can transform one into the other
      2. Ensure solution is comprehensible. And Document.
      3. Agree with position: "Negation" may be one problem for logicians, but the domain problems we face are different. Assuming it's one problem that can be solved with a common abstract design actually makes the problems worse.
      4. CDA examples task force is making decisions with minimal input; we need to check them out.
        1. E.g., prohibition on using "no known" concepts in value properties
      5. The idea that the CDA boat has sailed is not persuasive. There are many years left in its lifespan, and it should be fixed where broken.
      6. Input for 2.0 now, 2.1 in ballot. And FHIR.
    3. Who is target audience? Standards designers, not implementers. This needs to be clearer.
  2. ECQI input
    1. Negation is used in specifications and patterns
    2. See QRDA I guide for suggested mapping from CDA document artifacts to QRDA measure format. Also paragraphs on negation in Vol 1.
    3. Note that QRDA negated Observation may be based on a CDA procedure not done.
  3. Other uses
    1. Glimpse of VA project to identify SCT values with implicit negation
      1. Explicit negation (i.e., in Situation hierarchy) not a problem: this can be identified for special handling
      2. Implicitly negated values need to be flagged so that logical inference doesn't get tripped up
    2. Note that we're not trying to completely automate medicine & make people unnecessary
      1. But rules can support and assist clinical processes
    3. Role of project:
      1. Not to dictate to designers how to design
      2. but to dictate that designers explicitly address negative cases in their guidance to implementers. Perhaps a maturity checklist can address this.
  4. Next week: focus on picture. Some readers find pictures easier than words.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • review Use Cases for completeness, classification for accuracy (all)


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • Continue review of requirements

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.

Copyright © Health Level Seven International ® ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The reproduction of this material in any form is strictly forbidden without the written permission of the publisher.