This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 15 August 2018"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 172: Line 172:
  
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
Agenda for 8/1:
+
Agenda for 8/22:
 
* tbd
 
* tbd
  

Revision as of 21:26, 15 August 2018

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2018-08-15
Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation



y Jay Lyle JP Systems
Yanyan Hu Joint Commission
y Senthil Nachimuthu 3M
y Ken Lord VA
y Rob Hausam IMO
Ben Hamlin NCQA
y Lisa Nelson
Emma Jones Allscripts
y George Dixon Allscripts
Michelle Miller Cerner
y Michael Padula Cerner
y Stephen Chu Joint Commission

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. review
    1. family history generic, including no history of x: George

Minutes

  1. family history updated (George)
    1. typically family history straightforward member and condition; no negations
      1. CCDA: example is fine, but it's pretty rare to negate family history
      2. breast cancer example of a condition where you might need a negation
      3. even breast cancer negation would tend to be in a progress note
      4. Issue of boundary between capture of data for human use and for automated processing
    2. no issues with CCDA example
    3. Issue: FHIR has two ways to go
      1. precoordinated code or List with empty reason
      2. no example to instruct us which way to go
      3. ask for one
    4. clinical need: to negate a specific condition for a specific relation; not, typically "no known problems"
      1. [track down fhir extension - allergyintolerance-substanceExposureRisk]
    5. List solution only addresses generic statement, not specific negation
      1. Also, Mappings that have already been done in CCDA on FHIR IG
        1. CCDA set of conditions -> fhir conditions, not a List
        2. Implementer community seems to prefer not to use list
    6. if precoordinated code exists 'no history of cancer'
      1. but none for a second disorder; use an expression?
      2. burden on terminology
    7. option: like Procedure, have a concrete tightly scoped property for presence/absence
      1. note: keep distinct from absence of data
    8. proposition: CDA negation and FHIR 'no known' mean the same thing for all practical purposes.
      1. no dissent
    9. Potential Rationale for when to use a list: to represent RIM Organizer

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • stakeholders interested in completion, secure resources
  • review posted document draft, examples


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

Agenda for 8/22:

  • tbd

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.