This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent October 19, 2017"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 69: Line 69:
 
* Corrected CR #13806 as requested.
 
* Corrected CR #13806 as requested.
 
* Reviewed current structure for new visitors
 
* Reviewed current structure for new visitors
 +
* drop the word policy from opening definition per [#10691]
 +
* marked 10706 as not persuasive as it can be managed with the current structure.
 +
* marked 13777  as not persuasive as no limitations on the category should be inferred from the examples

Latest revision as of 17:55, 19 October 2017

HL7 CBCP FHIR Consent Working Meeting

Weekly Meeting Logistics

Weekly meeting; Thursday 1:00 - 2:00 PM Eastern Time

Dial-in Number: (515) 604-9861

International Dial-in Numbers are provided

Access Code: 429554

Online Meeting Link: http://join.freeconferencecall.com/cbhs

Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page

Attendees

Member Name x Member Name x Member Name x Member Name
X David Pyke CBCC co-Chair . Johnathan Coleman CBCC Co-Chair X Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair . Grahame Grieve FHIR Director
. Alexander Mense Security Co-Chair X Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair . John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair . Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair
. Peter Branson X David Staggs . Ken Salyards . Diana Proud-Madruga
. Mike Davis . Neelima Chennamaraja . Ken Sinn . Beth Pumo
X Joe Lamy, Aegis . Joseph Quinn . Iona Thraen . Serafina Versaggi
. Igor Sirkovich . Ali Khan ONC Patient Choice Project rep . Saurav.Chowdhury . Greg Linden
. Lisa Nelson . Hank MayersPCWG Representative . Laura Heermann Langford PCWG Co-chair . Steve Eichner


Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page

Agenda

  • Roll-call
  • Consent Track for FHIR Connectathon
  • Review open CRs as time allows

Minutes

  • Roll Call
  • Corrected CR #13806 as requested.
  • Reviewed current structure for new visitors
  • drop the word policy from opening definition per [#10691]
  • marked 10706 as not persuasive as it can be managed with the current structure.
  • marked 13777 as not persuasive as no limitations on the category should be inferred from the examples